OPE-L
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]

Date: [ Previous | Next ] Thread: [ Previous | Next ] Index: [ Author | Date | Thread ]

IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.

[OPE-L:2065] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: gold

To: ope-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OPE-L:2065] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: gold
From: Jurriaan Bendien <djjb99@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2000 02:37:35 +0100

You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.

Costas wrote:

>If the gold industry is subject to profit rate
>equalisation (as I agree that we must assume),

I don't think we should necessarily assume this, in view of the fact that
there may be insurmountable barriers to entry by private capitals into this
sector. However in the long haul it must be true.

In solidarity

Jurriaan

References:
- [OPE-L:2057] Re: Re: Re: gold
  - From: Duncan K. Foley
- [OPE-L:2043] Re: Re: gold
  - From: Jurriaan Bendien
- [OPE-L:2042] Re: Re: Re: the money supply
  - From: clyder
- [OPE-L:2039] Re: Re: the money supply
  - From: Claus Germer
- [OPE-L:2061] Re: Re: Re: Re: gold
  - From: coslap

Prev by Date: [OPE-L:2064] Re: Re: the nature of a commodity and the meaning of class struggle
Next by Date: [OPE-L:2066] Re: Re: Re: Re: gold
Previous by thread: [OPE-L:2061] Re: Re: Re: Re: gold
Next by thread: [OPE-L:2066] Re: Re: Re: Re: gold
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Thread context:
- [OPE-L:2043] Re: Re: gold, (continued)
  - [OPE-L:2046] Re: Re: Re: the money supply, Allin Cottrell Thu 06 Jan 2000, 15:27 GMT
- [OPE-L:2038] RE: Re: Units of measure, P . J . Wells Wed 05 Jan 2000, 18:13 GMT
- [OPE-L:2036] RE: Re: Units of measure, P . J . Wells Wed 05 Jan 2000, 16:30 GMT

[ Other Periods | Other mailing lists | Search ]