IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
You write: > >What you have described there is not the value of a commodity but what marx >represents as its price, its exchange value in terms of the universal >equivalent gold. So does gold itself have a price of production, or only a value ? What is your opinion ? For convenience, I will quote Prof. Mandel's argument (which is different from Prof. Itoh's): "...if commodity-producting labour needs a general equivalent, a 'thing' in which the social character of its labour is immediately recognised, money can play that role only because it is itself a commodity. Money is itself the product of abstract human labour, of a fragment of the total labour potential at the disposal of a given society. Otherwise, money and all commodities would in turn remain incommensurable. The money-commodity gold is therefore the one commodity hich enters the circulation process with its value and not with a price. When Marx states that all commodities can enter the circulation process only price-determined (preisbestimmt), this implies that their price is the expression of their value in the value of the money-commodity. Any other conclusion would be based upon circular reasoning. One cannot presuppose the existence of a price determinaton of commodities without explaining what determines their prices. One cannot suppose that these prices depend upon the money-commodity without determining what determines the value of gold. One cannot determine the value of gold without determining the nature of all value, or upon the tacit assumption of incommensurability of commodities on the one hand - prices not determined by value - and of gold on the other hand. Either gold has a value, or it has a 'price' determined by 'something' else than value, different and apart from the price of all other commodities. Hence it would be incommensurable with all other commodities. Only because gold has a value can all other commodities have prices. But only because the prices of all other commodities are based upon value, can the value of gold determine the prices of commodities" (E. Mandel, Gold, money and the transformation problem, p. 143-144). In solidarity Jurriaan Bendien
- [OPE-L:2041] The Money Supply, chaion lee Thu 06 Jan 2000, 02:24 GMT
- [OPE-L:2040] The Money Supply, chaion lee Thu 06 Jan 2000, 02:15 GMT
- [OPE-L:2039] Re: Re: the money supply, Claus Germer Wed 05 Jan 2000, 19:07 GMT
- [OPE-L:2042] Re: Re: Re: the money supply, clyder Thu 06 Jan 2000, 11:34 GMT
- [OPE-L:2043] Re: Re: gold, Jurriaan Bendien Thu 06 Jan 2000, 13:06 GMT
- [OPE-L:2045] Re: Re: Re: gold, clyder Thu 06 Jan 2000, 14:38 GMT
- [OPE-L:2057] Re: Re: Re: gold, Duncan K. Foley Sat 08 Jan 2000, 04:51 GMT
- [OPE-L:2061] Re: Re: Re: Re: gold, coslap Sat 08 Jan 2000, 17:51 GMT
- [OPE-L:2065] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: gold, Jurriaan Bendien Sun 09 Jan 2000, 03:04 GMT