IMPORTANT: If you cite this message, OPE-L policy requires you not to reveal the identity of the author.
You may cite this message only if you do not disclose who wrote it.
> > How do you measure the power of an engine? Horse-power, right? Yet, an > > engine is by no means composed of the same substance as a horse. > > > > Yeah, I know, that's probably not a good example. > > Horses are flesh and blood and engines are metal, but they also have > one common substance, namely the ability to perform work (in the mechanical > sense) measured by time, mass and distance (if I recall correctly). Watt introduced a purely notional horse into the measurement. He posited a horse able to lift 3390lbs through a distance of 1 foot in a minute.
- [OPE-L:2038] RE: Re: Units of measure, P . J . Wells Wed 05 Jan 2000, 18:13 GMT
- [OPE-L:2036] RE: Re: Units of measure, P . J . Wells Wed 05 Jan 2000, 16:30 GMT
- [OPE-L:2037] Re: Units of measure, Gerald Levy Wed 05 Jan 2000, 17:02 GMT
- [OPE-L:2033] Units of measure, P . J . Wells Wed 05 Jan 2000, 13:59 GMT
- [OPE-L:2035] Re: Units of measure, clyder Wed 05 Jan 2000, 16:11 GMT
- [OPE-L:2030] Re: Value of Au, John Ernst Wed 05 Jan 2000, 05:13 GMT
- [OPE-L:2054] Re: Re: Value of Au, Duncan K. Foley Sat 08 Jan 2000, 04:51 GMT
- [OPE-L:2028] RE: Re: A possible paradox in the theory of value, P . J . Wells Tue 04 Jan 2000, 23:14 GMT
- [OPE-L:2029] Re: RE: Re: A possible paradox in the theory of value, Andrew_Kliman Wed 05 Jan 2000, 04:17 GMT