Re: [Marxism] statistics for students?

["Timothy Barr" <timjim7@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

This man claims that the Hockey Stick Theory has been rejected by the IPCC.
Where does he get this from? It seems as if the IPCC has merely acknowledged
that bias exists in all constructions based on multi-proxy data, but that
they rejected the error margin of McKitrick & McIntyre. 

http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/docs/WG1AR4_SPM_Approved_05Feb.pdf 

Let's find a better source for prodding the statistics used by the media.
And hopefully one with a better interface.

Tim 

-----Original Message-----
From: marxism-bounces+timjim7=comcast.net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:marxism-bounces+timjim7=comcast.net@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Paddy Apling
Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 3:03 PM
To: Tim Barr
Subject: Re: [Marxism] statistics for students?

PS to my original message.
Those particularlty interested in the evaluation of forcasting from 
time-sequence data would be well advised ro read 
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/2009%20March.htm and follow his links.

Actually, this advice should be given to 95% of the current generation of 
scientists-publicists, and, for members of this list, it is a crucial 
warning that great scepticism needs to be taken of all the current doomsday 
forecasts.

Paddy
http://apling.freeservers.com

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/timjim7%40comcast.net


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu