Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] Long Live the North Korean Nuclear Program!
Fred, I think there is much to defend in the very rational belief that
"rights" should be defended regardless but that they should be always
exercised is rather a tactical question. I think formally speaking,
Healy was absolutely right against Hansen. Healy's problem (one of many)
is that to him, uttering "I defend Cuba's right to have bases" is
enough. That's because his whole political tradition is based
exclusively on the "The Right Program" and no actions or anything else
to put that program to a test.
I defended, actively, Argentina's "right" to control it's national
territory called the Malvinas. Many on the left *failed* this test, as
you well know. However, and while there was no internet then, speaking
on the actual 'correctness" of the Colonels to launch an invasion
against a nuclear armed Imperialist power was open to A LOT OF
QUESTIONS. Our little committee in San Diego was composed of a few US
leftists, Argentine immigrants and a whole lot of very staunchly Irish
Republicans. We may of been the only US city with an "Argentine
Solidarity Committee", I don't know. But we used to discuss this openly,
in forums, etc. We have NO obligations to defend the *decisions* of
countries simply because the are odds with imperialism.
The exact same thing can be said, as I noted, but you didn't respond to,
with Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait to take it back for Iraq, to
actually implement (many don't know this) the *standing policy* of every
Iraqi gov't up through Hussein since independence from Britain. But
SHOULD he have done this? NO. Not in my opinion, not trying to give the
world the impression that he wasn't going to be smashed, hundreds of
thousands of Iraqis dead because of it, etc. So, what is a
"provocation"? Yes, absolutely and without doubt. The current state of
Iraq is largely the result of this idiocy on the Baath leaders part in
misreading his former mentor's (the US) reactions.
So, assuming for a second that Joaquin is wrong to doubt the veracity of
the various charges that Korea detonated a nuclear device...that they
still have right to do it, doesn't absolve them of the responsibility of
understanding what the *results* may be in using them. In discussion
with friends, political associates, we have to defend Korea's right of
"defend" itself. But this doesn't mean one can't analyze and explain,
the problems with the exercise of this right. That in fact it could lead
to something far worse.
David
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] Long Live the North Korean Nuclear Program!, (continued)
- Re: [Marxism] Long Live the North Korean Nuclear Program!,
Nestor Gorojovsky Sat 30 May 2009, 18:00 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Long Live the North Korean Nuclear Program!,
Joaquin Bustelo Sat 30 May 2009, 19:10 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Long Live the North Korean Nuclear Program!,
Fred Feldman Sat 30 May 2009, 22:55 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Long Live the North Korean Nuclear Program!,
nada Sat 30 May 2009, 23:33 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Long Live the North Korean Nuclear Program!,
nada Sat 30 May 2009, 23:53 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Long Live the North Korean Nuclear Program!,
Waistline2 Sun 31 May 2009, 02:43 GMT
- [Marxism] 24 City,
Louis Proyect Sat 30 May 2009, 17:17 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] The Cranes are Flying worldwide distribution, and why payback is not piracy,
Mehmet Cagatay Sat 30 May 2009, 17:09 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]