Re: [Marxism] Fascism and caudillos

[Nestor Gorojovsky <nmgoro@xxxxxxxxx>]

I can´t understand in which sense what follows by Tom Cod:


>  In what way?  It is exactly this sterile petty bourgois intellectual 
> attitude of complacency that needs to be opposed.  How about more solidarity 
> and fewer sophmoric school boy lectures?  Maybe you should volunteer to do 
> legal work for Demjanjuk and the like, I mean just because they volunteered 
> to work in death camps for the Nazis, doesn't make them such? it's not as 
> though they're bad people?
> 

Answers this by Néstor G.:

> 
>>> I am afraid you missed the basic point here, Tom. And it is this thugh
>>> who answers:
>>>> "yeah, basically we're what you'd call fascists"
>>> What _you`d_ call fascists are not necessarily fascists.
>>>
>>> But, OK, won´t argue on this issue.
>>>

And this is limitation that affects me is the reason why I refuse to 
argue. Since I am not in a position to debate (my being unable to 
understand my opponent heavily hampers my debating skills) it would be a 
disservice to the list if I swamped myself in what can´t but become a 
hot and pointless, endless argument.

I am a limited spirit. I am sorry for that, but can´t help it.

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu