Re: [Marxism] Misunderstanding Solidarity Re: ISO's conference.

[Andrew Pollack <acpollack2@xxxxxxxxx>]

So I guess not being democratic centralist means never having to say
your sorry for one of your members selling out a leader of the working
class.
And anyway it wasn't just one member. The entire Solidarity
leadership, including those leading Labor Notes and TDU, betrayed Ron
Carey. And this was particularly scandalous as Ron was driven out of
office by a vengeful government/boss combination determined that there
would be no further victories like the one at UPS.
And we're still paying the price.

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Jon Hiesfelter <redbeard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It boggles the mind that you could be a member of Solidarity not once
> but twice and still not understand that Solidarity is not a Democratic
> Centralist organization, that individual members are free to hold
> opinions and share them in public, that other members are not
> responsible for the entire list of opinions held by other members in the
> group - and so on.
>

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu