Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] Af-Pak is Obamaâ?Ts War
Louis,
Please unsub this "guy. He is just too "cute" to be anything but a troll.
Darrel
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Michael Smith" <mjs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 7:34 PM
To: "Darrel Furlotte" <darrel.furlotte@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Marxism] Af-Pak is Obamaâ?Ts War
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 18:43:28 -0400
> "S. Artesian" <sartesian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Tell you what you do comrade ask women what they think of being called
>> that
>> term.
>>
>> No more a simply anatomical term than calling you an asshole would be
>> simply
>> anatomical.
>
> There you have it. Being called an "asshole" -- or a "prick" --
> is offensive, in just the same way as being called a "cunt" is.
>
> If you call me a "prick" you don't invoke or buy into some
> apparatus of gender differentiation or subjugation. You just
> associate me with a body part that we still conceal in public,
> no matter how enlightened we are. Why is it different for "cunt"?
>
> Nobody wants to be called a "prick" or a "cunt", but I've known
> guys who referred to their pricks by that name, and girls who
> referred to their cunts as such, without any apparent complication
> of feeling.
>
> How about "tits"? How bad is that?
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] Af-Pak is Obamaâ?Ts War, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]