Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[Marxism] Hatfield: Swine Flu Shines Bright Light On Factory Farm Practices (VIDEO)



http://m.huffpost.com/top/9258/full/

Hatfield: Swine Flu Shines Bright Light On Factory Farm Practices (VIDEO)
Leslie Hatfield UPDATED:

05/01/2009 As I wrote earlier this week, the virus formerly known as the swine
flu (although the CDC continues to say that indeed the H1N1 strain does, as
initially reported, contain swine, human and avian virus components) seems
quite likely to have links to an industrial hog operation in the La Gloria
community where the outbreak was believed to have started, although new
information suggests that this strain of the flu may actually have origins in
the US as well as Asia. As could be expected, Smithfield Foods, the world's
largest pork processor and co-owner of the La Gloria facility in question, came
out early last weekend denying culpability in the outbreak.

With test results at the La Gloria facility painfully slow to emerge, I want to
point out here that I'm not saying definitively that this flu is the result of
Smithfield's practices, but I do tend to follow the reasoning of Tom Philpott
of Grist, writing on the 28th:The question now becomes: Did the outbreak that
started in February and killed three kids involve swine flu-or was the
4-year-old boy's infection an isolated case? If not-if the La Gloria epidemic
turns out to be ground zero of the infection-could the swine-flu outbreak have
originated literally in the shadows of Granjas Carroll's hog confinements, and
not have some tie to intensive hog farming? That's a question that health
authorities have to vigorously pursue.

Today, Smithfield CEO Larry Pope sat down for an interview on CNBC to counter
the rumors. From the interview:
POPE: Oh. You-- in fact, our-- our team that went down even this week,they have
not been allowed on the farm yet. Because they haven't-- they haven't satisfied
the quarantine period. So our own executives can't go on the farm until they've
satisfied a quarantine. But I tell people when you visit our farms, I'm not
concerned about you. I'm concerned about the pigs. I'm concerned about you
contaminating the pigs. Not the pigs contaminating you.

BURNETT: And this is because pigs and humans, in terms of DN-- there--there's a
lot of similarities.
POPE: There are.
BURNETT: That's the bottom line. So that's why diseases can go back andforth.
POPE: People-- people can give it to them. They can give-- they cangive some to
people on-- on occasion. But this doesn't appear to bethat case at all. It
doesn't appear to be there at all. And again, it doesn't transmit through the
meat.

That nobody has been sickened by eating the meat is not at issue, though one
could imagine why such a question would be of great importance to the head of
the largest pork production company in the world. It is interesting to note
that nobody has said specifically that a person could not be infected by
handling raw pork from an animal that was infected. I think it's also worth
noting here what Pope doesn't come right out and say -- that conditions at
their facilities create such a tenuous situation for the health of these
animals that they have to take these precautions (which may be preventing some
of those quite-slow test results) when humans visit these facilities.

Whether or not scientists pin this strain of influenza on Smithfield, the fact
that factory farms are a breeding ground for infectious diseases is well
documented. Hans-Gerhard Wagner, a senior officer with the U.N.'s Food and
Agriculture Organization, has called the "intensive industrial farming of
livestock" an "opportunity for emerging disease."Not only that, but the
ecological implications of industrial agriculture are worth mentioning here as
well.

Interestingly enough, Jeff Tietz's 2006 Rolling Stone article, Boss Hog, is
still among the best I've seen on the subject.In it, Tietz points out that a
single Smithfield plant in Utah, housing a half million animals, generates more
fecal waste per year than the 1.5 million people in Manhattan. He goes on to
point out that companies like Smithfield are not required to treat said waste
in the manner that local governments are required to treat human waste and
that:The excrement of Smithfield hogs is hardly even pig sh*t: On a continuum
of pollutants, it is probably closer to radioactive waste than to organic
manure. The reason it is so toxic is Smithfield's efficiency.

Smithfield's holding ponds -- the company calls them lagoons -- cover as much
as 120,000 square feet. The area around a single slaughterhouse can contain
hundreds of lagoons, some of which run thirty feet deep. The liquid in them is
not brown. The interactions between the bacteria and blood and afterbirths and
stillborn piglets and urine and excrement and chemicals and drugs turn the
lagoons pink.Even light rains can cause lagoons to overflow; major floods have
transformed entire counties into pig-sh*t bayous. To alleviate swelling
lagoons, workers sometimes pump the sh*t out of them and spray the waste on
surrounding fields, which results in what the industry daintily refers to as
"overapplication." This can turn hundreds of acres -- thousands of football
fields -- into shallow mud puddles of pig sh*t. Tree branches drip with pig
sh*t.Please go to corresponding website for complete details.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]