Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] Fidel: Obama misinterpreted my brother's remarks
- To: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [Marxism] Fidel: Obama misinterpreted my brother's remarks
- From: "Lüko Willms" <lueko.willms@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:03:18 +0200 (MES)
- User-agent: PMMail/3.04 (os/2; U; Warp 4.5; de-DE-EURO; i386; ver 3.04.52.1353)
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:04:44 -0400 Louis Proyect wrote:
>
>
> That appeared to enrage Fidel Castro, 82, who wrote in an essay posted
> on a government website that Obama "without a doubt misinterpreted
> Raul's declarations."
This "essay" is of course available in its original:
---------------- full text ---------------------------
> English translation
<http://www.cuba.cu/gobierno/reflexiones/2009/ing/f210409i.html>
> español original
<http://www.cuba.cu/gobierno/reflexiones/2009/esp/f210409e.html>
Translations into other languages than English:
> Français
<http://www.cuba.cu/gobierno/reflexiones/2009/fra/f210409f.html>
> Portugues
<http://www.cuba.cu/gobierno/reflexiones/2009/por/f210409p.html>
> italiano <http://www.cuba.cu/gobierno/reflexiones/2009/ita/f210409t.html>
> deutsch
<http://www.cuba.cu/gobierno/reflexiones/2009/ale/f210409a.html>
Reflections by Comrade Fidel
OBAMA AND THE BLOCKADE
Yesterday I referred to what was funny about the "Declaration of Commitment
of Port of Spain".
Today I could refer to what is tragic about it. I hope our friends do not take
any offence in this. There were some differences between the draft that we
received, which was going to be submitted by the hosts of the Summit, and
the document that was finally published. In all that last-minute haste, there
was hardly any time for anything. Some items had been discussed at long
meetings held some weeks previous to the Summit. At the very last moment,
proposals such as the one submitted by Bolivia, complicated even more the
whole picture. The Bolivian proposal was included as a note in the
document. It stated that Bolivia considered that the implementation of
policies and cooperation schemes aimed at expanding the use of bio-fuels in
the western hemisphere could affect and have an impact on the availability
of foodstuffs, the increase of food prices, deforestation, the displacement of
populations as a result of the land demand, and that consequently this could
make the food crisis to be even worse, which will directly affect low income
persons and, most of all, the poorest economies among developing countries.
The note added that the Bolivian government, while recognizing the need to
look for and resort to environmentally friendly alternative sources of energy,
such as the geothermal, solar, and eolic sources of energy, and to small and
medium size hydro-power generators, it advocates for an alternative
approach, based on the possibility of living well and in harmony with nature,
in order to develop public policies aimed at the promotion of safe alternative
energies that could ensure the preservation of the planet, our 'mother land'.
When analyzing this note submitted by Bolivia please bear in mind that the
United States and Brazil are the two biggest producers of bio-fuels in the
world, something that is opposed by an increasing number of persons in the
planet, whose resistance has been growing since the dark days of George
Bush.
Obama's advisors published in the Internet their version -in English- of the
interview the US president granted to some journalists in Port of Spain. At
one point, he asserted that there was something he found interesting -an
added that he had known of it in a more abstract way but that he found it
interesting in more specific terms- which was listening to these leaders who,
when speaking about Cuba, did so referring specifically to the thousands of
doctors Cuba is disseminating throughout the region, and finding how much
these countries depended on them. He said this reminded them in the US of
the fact that if their only interaction with many of these countries was the
war on drugs; that if their only interaction was of a military character, then
it
was possible that they would not be developing connections that, with time,
could enhance their influence with a positive effect when they may find it
necessary to advance policies of their interest in the region.
He said he thought that was the reason why it was so important -for the sake
of their interaction, not only here in this hemisphere, but in the whole world-
to recognize that their military power was just part of their power, and that
they have to resort to diplomacy and their aid to development in a more
intelligent way, so that peoples could see concrete and practical
improvements in the life of ordinary citizens, based on the foreign policy of
the United States.
Jake, one of the journalists, said thanks to the President and added that in
Port of Spain the President had listened to many Latin American leaders who
want the US to lift the embargo against Cuba. The journalist reminded the
President he had said that was an important influence that should not be
eliminated. But he added that in 2004 the President did support the lifting of
the embargo. He reminded the President he had said that the embargo had
not managed to raise the standards of living, that it had squeezed the
innocent, and that it was high time for the US to recognize that that
particular
policy had failed. The journalist wondered what made the President change
his opinion with regards to the embargo.
The President responded that the year 2004 seemed to be thousands of years
ago, and wondered what he himself was doing in 2004.
The journalist answered that back then he was running for the Senate. The
President added that the fact that Raul Castro had said his government was
ready to talk with the US government not only about the lifting of the
embargo but also about other issues, namely, human rights and political
prisoners, was a signal of progress. He said there were some things the
Cuban government could do. He added that Cuba could release the political
prisoners, reduce the surcharge imposed on remittances, which will
correspond with the policies that they have applied, whereby
Cuban-American families are allowed to send remittances. He said that it so
happened that Cuba applies a very high surcharge. He said that Cuba is
exacting significant profits. He added that this would be an example of
cooperation where both governments would be working to help the Cuban
family and improve the living standards in Cuba.
There is no doubt that the President misinterpreted Raul's statements.
When the President of Cuba said he was ready to discuss any topic with the
US President, he meant he was not afraid of addressing any issue. That
shows his courage and confidence on the principles of the Revolution. No
one should feel astonished that Raul spoke about pardoning those who were
convicted on March, 2003, and about sending them all to the United States,
should that country be willing to release the Five Cuban Anti-Terrorism
Heroes. The convicts, as was already the case with the Bay of Pig's
mercenaries, are at the service of a foreign power that threatens and
blockades our homeland.
Besides, the assertion that Cuba imposes a very high surcharge and obtains
significant profits is an attempt by the President's advisors to cause trouble
and division among Cubans. Every country charges a certain amount for all
hard currency transfers. If those are made in dollars, all the more reason we
have to do it, because that is the currency of the country that blockades us.
Not all Cubans have relatives abroad that could send them remittances.
Redistributing a relatively small part of them to benefit those more in need of
food, medicines and other goods is absolutely fair. Our homeland does not
have the privilege of converting the money minted by the State into hard
currency -something the Chinese very often call "junk money"- as I have
explained on several occasions, which has been one of the causes of the
present economic crisis. With what money the US is bailing out its banks and
multinationals, while plunging future generations of Americans into
indebtedness? Would Obama be ready to discuss those issues?
Daniel Ortega stated it very clearly when he remembered the first
conversation he had with Carter, which today I will once more repeat:
"I had the opportunity to meet with President Carter, and when he told me
that now, after the Somozas' tyranny had been ousted, and the Nicaraguan
people had defeated the Somozas' tyranny, it was high time 'for Nicaragua to
change', I said: 'No, Nicaragua does not need to change; you are the ones
that need to change. Nicaragua has never invaded the United States.
Nicaragua has never mined the US ports. Nicaragua has never launched a
single stone against the American nation. Nicaragua has not imposed any
government on the United States. You are the ones that need to change, not
the Nicaraguans.' "
At the press conference, as well as in the final meetings of the Summit,
Obama looked conceited. Such attitude by the US President was consistent
with the abject positions adopted by some Latin American leaders. Some
days ago I said that whatever was said and done at the Summit will be known
anyway.
When the US President said, in answering to Jake, that thousands of years
had elapsed since 2004 until the present, he was superficial. Should we wait
for so many years before his blockade is lifted? He did not invent it, but he
embraced it just as much as the previous ten US presidents did. Should he
continue down that same path, we could predict he would face a sure fiasco,
just as all his predecessor did. That is not the dream entertained by Martin
Luther King, whose role in the struggle for human rights will ever more
illuminate the American people's path.
We are living in a new era. Changes are unavoidable. Leaders just pass
through; peoples prevail. There would be no need to wait for thousands of
years to pass by; only eight years will be enough so that a new US President
-who will no doubt be less intelligent, promising and admired in the world
than Barack Obama- riding on a better armored car, or on a more modern
helicopter, or on a more sophisticated plane, occupies that inglorious
position.
Tomorrow we shall have more news about the Summit.
Fidel Castro Ruz
April 21, 2009
5:34 p.m.
----------------- end text ------------------
Saludos,
Lüko Willms
Frankfurt, Germany
--------------------------------
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]