Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] Morales and Obama
1) Both Morales and Obama come from ethnic backgrounds
that are ?problematic? for the white
conservative/right-wing elites that have historically
swapped power amongst themselves ? Morales is an Aymara
and therefore representative of one set of the indigenous
peoples roundly despised by the elite criollo/mestizo
groupings in Boliva, Obama, whilst phenotypically
obviously African American is of mixed-race origin that
presents another set of problems (remember the false
?Barack the magic negro/?is he black enough? binary?) and
worse still his black father isn?t even American.
2) Both Morales and Obama come to power using the
legitimate electoral machinery of their respective
countries in which, as it becomes more and more likely
that they will achieve power the savagery of rhetoric
against and opposition to them (strongly linked to their
ethnicity) increases exponentially (Obama is a
?terrorist?, Morales a ?communist?, ?drug trafficker?).
3) Both Morales and Obama come to power at times of
intense economic crisis (although to be fair that?s
practically endemic in Bolivia) and at a time when the
traditional elites have run out of options and resorted to
particularly brutal and desperate measures to quash
opposition to them, Goni through having the police and
army open fire on and kill a number of unarmed
demonstrators and Bush by, well, you name it ? warrantless
wiretapping, the Patriot Act, use of ?anti-terrorist?
legislation against legitimate civil protest groups, etc.
4) Both Morales and Obama come to power at the head of
umbrella movements containing substantial radical elements
that do not trust them and make it plain that they expect
the fulfilment of a radical agenda as a condition of
continued support.
5) On achieving power ?legitimately? or at least through
the accepted electoral norms, both Morales and Obama begin
to implement parts of the agendas expected of them in the
face of immediately hostile opposition not just from the
right-wing elites opposed to them but from the more
conservative members of their own coalition ? this
opposition is frequently couched in borderline racist
terms, the right in the US through challenging Obama?s
citizenship and hinting at ?terrorist? sympathies and the
right in Bolivia through outright disparaging of Morales?
ethnicity ? ?Kollas? are all drug-smugglers, thieves, lazy
workshy filth who just want to take the wealth of Bolivia
that doesn?t belong to them, etc.
6) After brief attempts at working through the existing
structures of government, both Morales and Obama find that
an increasingly hysterical conservative opposition begins
to disengage with them and to seeks to ignore their
electoral victory through stonewalling any attempts at
legislation and through operating outside of accepted
government structures by laying claim to some higher
democratic morality which disguises the elitism and racism
of their motives ? in the US through a patently absurd
movement to assert states rights over those of the Federal
government, and in Bolivia through the creation of a
made-up state based on Santa Cruz, which just so happens
to have territorial control of the bulk of natural gas
reserves?.
Remember, I?m not making any effort to equate them, their
backgrounds, political movements or anything else except
to look at the similarities in the ways in which racist
dynamics, filtered through the radically different
socio-cultural environments, express themselves.
Jon Cloke
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]