Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] meaning of labor time in Capital
full: _http://www.gocatgo.com/texts/eov.html_
(http://www.gocatgo.com/texts/eov.html)
Value as a historical thing
Capitalism, as a commodity-producing system, is a Value system. Value
describes the presence and activity of human beings in the production of
social
life under specific historic conditions. It is above all a social
relation. It emerges in human society at a particular stage of its
development.
Once the productive forces of society have developed sufficiently, and with it
the division of labor; exchange and "the market" become possible. Once
this occurs, the commodity emerges on the stage of human history, and with it,
Value: "This division of a product into a useful thing and a value becomes
practically important, only when exchange has acquired such an extension
that useful articles are produced for the purpose of being exchanged, and
their character as values has therefore to be taken into account, beforehand,
during production." (Marx, 1967: 78) Evidence of exchange, and presumably
production for exchange extends into pre-written history, and played a
substantial role in the pre-industrial era, although not in the same
"predominating and characteristic manner as now-a-days." (Marx, 1967: 86; also
see,
e.g., Pound (1989), Frank (1998), Engels (1895))
With production for exchange, the commodity is born, and with the
commodity, Value, and the subordination of human beings to things, the
masquerading
of human relations as relations between things. In commodity production's
most complete and dominating expression, the capitalist system, labor power
becomes a commodity, and the Law of Value -- that commodities exchange on
the basis of the socially necessary labor contained in them[2] -- dominates
and regulates the economy and the lives of those bound up in capitalist
production relations.
A distinction should be made between "exchange", and other methods of
distributing social wealth, e.g., "sharing" or "contributing". That is, there
is a wide range of social production that takes place not for exchange. This
could include production for immediate use in the commune or other
relatively small social groupings, or at a much grander scale under different
production relations. In addition, there are areas of social life that have
historically been outside of commodity relations, although those areas are
being rapidly levelled and commodified under capitalism today. This distinction
is important because it helps to delineate the possible roles of human
beings in the production of social life. These roles are historic ones,
activity under particular conditions, bounded by the dominant production
relations. Terms like "work", "labor", "the job" become imbued with particular
meaning by social circumstances. The buying and selling of labor power does
not
describe the totality of possible relationships to production. Value does
not encompass all forms of the production of social life, and not all areas
of human activity are Value-producing. If goods are produced for use or
immediate consumption, that is, they are not produced for exchange; if the
social division of labor is such that the bulk of productive effort is not
specialized or rather widely shared, if the legal constructions of ownership
are impractical or non-existent, Value does not exist. Human activity
continues, though not necessarily as the Value relationship, and as a result
not
with the mantle of "job" or "work" a la Maynard G. Krebs.
If Value has a historical beginning, and only exists as a social relation
under certain conditions, we can see, and theorize conditions where it does
not exist. A pre-Value world is a society of original communism, where
"communism" describes a form of economic organization based on the organizing
principle of from each according to ability, to each according to need,
under conditions of what might be described as "absolute scarcity". We can
imagine also a communism based on "absolute abundance."
**************Join ChristianMingle.com® FREE! Meet Christian Singles in
your area. Start now!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221246370x1201421635/aol?redir=http://www.christianmingle.com/campaign.html?cat=adbuy&src=pl
atforma&adid=aolfooter&newurl=reg_path.html)
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] meaning of labor time in Capital, (continued)
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]