Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] Imperialism and the US working class (Was YADL)
Real wages for real workers dropped throughout the late 1970s and throughout
the 1980s. Workers who lost unionized jobs, industrial jobs like the
meatpackers whom Joaquin thinks stepped into better paying service jobs,
when able to find new jobs, generally experienced wage declines of some 30%
in the new job. This has been well studied, documented etc.
Rail workers who lost their jobs due to the bankruptcies and mergers in the
late 70s/80s [and into 90s], workers better protected and compensated than
most, who "flowed" to the increasing number of short-line railroads spun off
by the majors, lost considerable percentages of compensation, benefits, and
work rule protections-- as was/is also the case with airline pilots etc.
The historical conservativism of the white sector of the working class has
certainly resisted the decline in its power, wages, and protections-- but
those declines have been real nonetheless.
As for this notion of imperialist privilege-- a little data would help here.
Joaquin says the "imperialist countries grow rich as [at] the expense of the
colonial and semi-colonial countries. The overwhelming majority of the
population of imperialist countries share in this imperialist privilege."
Really? How rich? What portion of the wealth involves a transfer of wealth
from the colonial and semi-colonial countries. It would be helpful to get a
grip on the amounts involved in these supposed transfers. Lenin never
provided any data on this in Imperialism.
And then how does that transfer get "trickled down"? And I do mean the
quotation marks here-- because at the end, at the bottom line, all this
stuff about imperialist privilege and everyone in the imperialist countries
sharing in the spoils is nothing but the good old Reagan "trickle down"
theory dressed up in radical clothers.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joaquin Bustelo" <jbustelo@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <sartesian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Marxism] Imperialism and the US working class (Was YADL)
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] YADL (Yet another disillusioned liberal), (continued)
- Re: [Marxism] YADL (Yet another disillusioned liberal),
Marv Gandall Fri 03 Apr 2009, 02:42 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] YADL (Yet another disillusioned liberal),
Joaquin Bustelo Fri 03 Apr 2009, 17:30 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Imperialism and the US working class (Was YADL),
Marv Gandall Fri 03 Apr 2009, 23:29 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Imperialism and the US working class (Was YADL),
Joaquin Bustelo Sun 05 Apr 2009, 00:06 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Imperialism and the US working class (Was YADL),
S. Artesian Sun 05 Apr 2009, 02:57 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Imperialism and the US working class (Was YADL),
J . M . P . Cloke Sun 05 Apr 2009, 20:31 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Imperialism and the US working class (Was YADL),
Marv Gandall Sun 05 Apr 2009, 13:14 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Imperialism and the US working class (Was YADL),
Mark Lause Sun 05 Apr 2009, 15:38 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Imperialism and the US working class (Was YADL),
Jon Flanders Sun 05 Apr 2009, 17:02 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]