Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] Cuba's Energy Revolution,
Yes, poorly written sentence on my part, Eli.
There is a tendency on the left to glorify Cuba's response to a
situation that it found itself in and not to address the problem itself,
which is energy starvation. To the point that this becomes the 'answer'
for other countries. I've seen this sort of thing on blogs and other
arenas for left discussion. I praise Cuba as well for it's response. But
the 'response' itself is not the answer, or final answer, to it's energy
crisis. It's a lot more complex than that.
I knew that much of Cuba's oil fired generation was switching over to
diesel, hadn't realized it was in the form of diesel generators. Again,
Cuba is doing what it has to do in order to survive. Eli writes this,
however, as if the 1854 diesel and fuel oil micro-electrical plants is
somehow a 'good thing'. I think not, at least not necessarily. The
pollution caused by diesel generators will now be spread about island
instead of emanating from from the larger 2 dozen or so older oil fired
boilers that traditionally powered Cuba's grid. And...in fact...still
do. The efficiency, *mechanically*, of the small diesel generators is
not as good as larger, modern units burning the same fuel. So the Cubans
in once sense are going to take a hit on overall efficiency as measured
against the amount of fuel used to produce a given amount of
electricity. Also, the issue of growth and the natural increase of per
capita energy use as standards of living rise is not going away.
But...these smaller generators can be scaled up in use and installation
a LOT easier than bigger units so this gives the Cubans flexibility.
The Cubans decided, correctly as I see it, that it's cheaper to build
the diesel-electric generators than to string up more transmission lines
from these old central power stations. Diesel is more expensive than oil
(essentially oil in the older units are simply unrefined, but filtered,
crude oil) but burns cleaner and more efficiently than the fuel oil.
Diesel of course has it's own issues, including a different kind of
deadly particulate and, of course, because it's a distillate, costs
more. They import most of it but the PDVSA of Venezuela is going to
upgrade some of Cuba's oil refineries to produce it and, will build a
brand new oil refinery that can actually produce both diesel and
gasoline from Venezuela's tar-sand/heavy crude.
There are large rural areas where the national electric grid doesn't
reach. Grids are very, very expensive. So, Cuba has a rural
electrification program and the "micro-generators" fits in well.
Eventually, in the future, it can all be tied together in a hybrid form
of both small and large grids, integrated with large and small
generators, giving Cuba a grid not unlike that of Israel, which has a
powerful, yet decentralized, energy grid based on small-generator usage.
Cuba DOES have a lot of domestic oil now and it will start using it's
off shore oil for part of it's domestic consumption. I expect over the
next 5 to 10 years importing oil from Venezuela will no longer be
necessary. If their refineries are tuned for Venezuelan heavy crude, and
Cuba's offshore oil is light-sweet crude (which it is) then I can see
Cuba's national oil company working with PDVSA to export Cuba's own oil
while continuing use Venezuela's.
In 2001 Cuba issued a "final" notice on it's attempt to build the
Juragua Nuclear Power Plant in Cienfuegos that it would be canceled. To
my knowledge there has been no attempt to again revive the project. The
US objected from the get-go to the construction of the plant for safety
reasons (and some of them seemed to be legitimate concerns). The plant
was not the Chernobyl type reactor but still had many issues. Bulgaria
was forced to close two of the same type of these Russian reactors as a
criteria for joining the European Union.
There is some 'chatter' about approaching South African and/or China for
use of their pebble bed modular reactors but nothing serious.
David
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]