Re: [Marxism] British Government Refuses To Discuss Sovereignty of Malvinas

[NÃstor Gorojovsky <nmgoro@xxxxxxxxx>]

I certainly know that S. Artesian, with whom I have so many
disagreements, knew that there was no third party shooter. Either or
logic was implacable here. And all those who know what imperialism
means were with Argentina.

2009/3/29 S. Artesian <sartesian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> I've way overposted today, but let's sort this out properly.
>
> Simple question for Mr. Cloke: Âdid you agitate for, support, or otherwise
> endorse the defeat of the armed forces of Britain in the battle of the
> Malvinas? ÂRegardless of what others advocated in of by and for Argentina,
> did you suppor the defeat of your Highness's royal military?
>
> As one old geezer to another, that's a yes or no question, Âso let's quit
> taking the piss and just answer straightaway.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <J.M.P.Cloke@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <sartesian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 6:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [Marxism] British Government Refuses To Discuss Sovereignty of
> Malvinas
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________
> YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Set your options at: 
> http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/nmgoro%40gmail.com
>



-- 

NÃstor Gorojovsky
El texto principal de este correo puede no ser de mi autorÃa

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu