Re: [Marxism] Not 'RoP' but '% of total profits' - duh. Re: USprofits collapse in 4th qtr

["S. Artesian" <sartesian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Whatever... if it's the idiocy of rural life your offering instead of Eden--  
no thank you to both.

As for agricultural chemicals etc.-- you can account for their cost and 
impact but utilizing total factor productivity analyses.

Be that as it may, your original statement was that we should revise our 
analysis to conclude, or include, that China having 63-66% population tied 
to rural production isn't such a bad thing.

It is.  Anyway you cut it.

And there is nothing sustainable about small agriculture per se.

Sustainable agriculture as you describe is only possible when backed by 
sufficient industrial development to support the inputs required to make 
such activity yield beyond subsistence.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <sabocat59@xxxxxxx>
To: <sartesian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Marxism] Not 'RoP' but '% of total profits' - duh. Re: 
USprofits collapse in 4th qtr



________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu