Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: [Marxism] Not 'RoP' but '% of total profits' - duh. Re: US profitscollapse in 4th qtr



On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 04:14 +0000, sabocat59@xxxxxxx wrote:
> S. Artesian wrote:
>
> no part or whole of the bureaucracy successfully resolved that problem,
> with what 33% (?) of the population still tethered to agricultural
> production by the 1980s (those who think China is more than a paper
> dragon need to keep the crucial role of agricultural productivity in
> focus as 2/3 of China's population is bound to the countryside with
> agricultural productivity a pathetic fraction of the US measure)
> -------------------------------------
>
> As a side note, shouldn't we reconsider the stageist and
> developmentalist framework presupposed above?
>
> Isn't it high time to reconceptualize what it means to be an advanced
> society?
>
> Given the ecological crisis, having two-thirds of the population of
> China engaged in sustainable agriculture is not necessarily a bad
> thing, while we here in the USA could use many more organic farms than
> exist currently. Having so much of the population alienated from the
> land puts us at a distinct disadvantage.
>
> We could learn much from the example of Cuba in that respect. So could China.

But Chinese agriculture has nothing to do with developing a better model
to avoid economic crisis. Chinese agriculture in no way represents a
step towards "an advanced society". It's the bit that's been most left
behind. I've just come back from China and from what I saw, and from
people I visited and spoke to, Chinese farmers are as poor and third
world as all the reports suggest. And China is not self sufficient in
food as far as I am aware. Chinese farming is very labour intensive and
inefficient. The solution is not the Chinese "approach", which is not an
approach at all - just an outcome of the trajectory China is on. The
solution is a system whereby agriculture is sustainable, protects or
better still restores the environment, *and* frees people from menial
labour rather than returning them to it.
Cheers,
John


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]