Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Proletarians, peasants, and polemics
New Wave wrote:
>Without having a thorough understanding of 1925-27,
>neither can one understand the alignment of class
>forces in (the) Chinese revolution,
Yes, and dare I say that a thorough understanding of the
events in China during this period will require reading
something besides polemical literature designed to prove
a political point today which has nothing to do with
the events then. Who exactly wrote "The Hidden Dynamics
of the Chinese Revolution" and what is their background
in historical research? Tell me off line if you wish as
I would honestly like to know.
>...Maoist bureaucracy- the bureaucracy that came to
power on the back of defeats of proletariat in 1925-27
uprisings, the defeats which were fostered by none but
by the bureaucracy itself, acting under direct command
>of Stalinist Comintern.
By bureaucracy do you mean the cadre of the Chinese
Communist Party or just the cadre supportive of Mao?
Do you have evidence, from any source that shows Mao
was acting, ever, under the direct command of the
Comintern? The commonly accepted date for Mao's
leadership of the CCP is not until 1935. Is this what
you mean by "coming to power on the back of defeats
of the proletariat in 1925-27"? Even that 1935 date is
being challenged as too early by some and given the
tempo and complexity of events, I just cannot see
the simple, causal relationship you are trying to
construct.
Is this what you are trying to say?
*Stalin destroys the real "proletarian" CCP through
his control by way of "comintern agents" from 1925-
1927.
*Mao then builds a "fake" CCP comprised of peasants.
*The fake CCP takes over China in 1949 and for some
period of time the country is (or is not) socialist
before totally capitulating to capitalism at a date
for which there is no consensus.
Can you blame me for "reducing to absurdity" a
method of historical analysis already
absurd?
--
Become a medical transcriptionist at home, at your own pace.
http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/BLSrjkqfMmd8SqRLjHb6i1cnQOKaR3hhhSQsql4VRIhYz8KwEJhX8QKnLYc/
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] IL Gov't lawer: "The State of Israel is at war with the Palestinian people, people against people, collective against collective." (Avnery article),
Lüko Willms Sun 22 Mar 2009, 07:11 GMT
- [Marxism] Interview with Nepali gay activist,
Jeffrey Thomas Piercy Sun 22 Mar 2009, 06:44 GMT
- [Marxism] Antiwar movement - the next generation,
Eli Stephens Sun 22 Mar 2009, 05:51 GMT
- [Marxism] Proletarians, peasants, and polemics,
sobuadhaigh Sun 22 Mar 2009, 03:02 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Strikes in France,
Greg Dunkel Sun 22 Mar 2009, 02:57 GMT
- [Marxism] Inquiry regarding Easter Rebellion,
Michael Friedman Sat 21 Mar 2009, 21:45 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]