Re: [Marxism] Zizek interview in the FT

["S. Artesian" <sartesian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

But it certainly is not an explanation, even a partial explanation for the 
forces that shaped the USSR after November 1917, after the civil war, after 
the NEP; after 1928.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shane Mage" <shmage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


>
> Of course it doesn't.  But Zizek's nonsense shouldn't be allowed to
> hide the fact, denounced at the very outset by the great Marxist
> psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich (in "The Sexual Revolution") as well as by
> Trotsky, that reactionary sexual politics, just like reaction in the
> economic, cultural, social, political, and scientific domains, was an
> essential part of the Stalinist counterrevolution.
>
>
> Shane Mage
> 


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu