Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[Marxism] Why do we criticize?




There's been a long discussion, mostly between Ruthless Critic and Jscotlive,
around the question of criticizing anti-imperialists who might not meet with
our 100% approval on some ground or other - FARC, Hamas, etc. Here's a key
assertion from Ruthless in this discussion:

"Marxists *must* get out of this habit of defending some entities merely
because imperialism attacks these entities. They *must* be criticized for their
failings, whether they are under attack by imperialism or not. That is the only
principled position for Marxists to take."

Actually it's rather interesting that in this one paragraph, Ruthless goes from
saying we shouldn't *defend* some entities to saying we *must* (must!)
criticize them.

So why *do* we "criticize" things? Well, we criticize our *own* imperialist
governments because we want to overthrow them, and we need to rouse and/or
educate those who will effectuate that overthrow. But why would we criticize an
*anti-imperialist movement* in *another* country (and here I'm referring, as I
believe Ruthless is, to *public* criticism, not criticism in a private,
internal discussion amongst revolutionaries)? Not to belabor my lame analogy,
but I think this relates directly back to my "cooties" theory
(http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/marxism/2007w47/msg00158.htm). It's
very uncomfortable to be accused of being a "Saddam-lover" or an "apologist for
Ahmadinejad" or a "supporter of Hamas or FARC terrorists" etc. People like
Ruthless want to remain pure, uncontaminated by the "cooties" associated with
something that people (liberals, generally) perceive as unacceptable about,
e.g., FARC, Cuba, Hamas, etc. Far easier to join in the criticism (as if there
isn't already enough).

What I'm saying, then, is that criticism of imperialism is about overthrowing
imperialism. Criticism of anti-imperialists is, in my opinion, about one thing
and one thing only - the criticizer. Allowing the criticizer to feel good about
him or herself, *at the expense of the anti-imperialist movement* being
criticized.


Eli Stephens
Left I on the News
http://lefti.blogspot.com


_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™ Contacts: Organize your contact list.
http://windowslive.com/connect/post/marcusatmicrosoft.spaces.live.com-Blog-cns!503D1D86EBB2B53C!2285.entry?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_UGC_Contacts_032009
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]