[Marxism] Oil And Gold Markets Divergence

[brad bauerly <bbauerly@xxxxxxxxx>]

http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/02/23/commodities-send-coded-clues-on-inflation/
Commodities
send coded clues on
inflation<http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2009/02/23/commodities-send-coded-clues-on-inflation/>
By:
John Kemp <http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/author/johnkemp/>

After an 8-year period of remarkable stability, the ratio between gold and
oil prices has broken down spectacularly.

The relative rise in gold is consistent with other indications that the
market is bracing for a delayed upturn in inflation between 2010 and 2012.

>From 2000 to 2008 one ounce of gold bought between 6 and 15 barrels of light
sweet crude oil but for months the markets have been moving in opposite
directions. In recent weeks, one ounce of gold has bought as many as 27
barrels of oil (https://customers.reuters.com/d/graphics/OILGOLDRATIO.pdf).

If both gold and oil prices encapsulate a view about prospects for the world
economy and inflation, the divergent price moves present a seeming
contradiction.

The surge in gold prices suggests investors are anxious to protect their
capital against inflation, currency depreciation and bank failures. But weak
or falling prices for oil and other commodities suggest investors are also
bracing for a prolonged period of economic weakness and deflation.

How to reconcile these views?  They cannot both be right.

If the massive liquidity injections into the banking system as a result of
rescue packages and quantitative easing causes inflation to pick up, oil
prices reflected in the forward curve will turn out to be far too low. If
the world economy falls into a long deflationary slump, gold will be too
high.

In either event, it ought to be able to trade the ratio, selling expensive
gold futures to buy cheap oil ones, and wait for the ratio to converge back
to more "normal" levels.

But such trades are more dangerous than they look.

Ratios can be remarkably stable and show strong trend-reverting properties
for long periods of time. But when they break down, divergences often go
further and last longer than most anticipate.

John Maynard Keynes warned that the market can remain irrational longer than
the average investor can remain solvent. All but the strongest investors
with deep pockets will struggle to meet margin calls until the ratio
corrects and profits are made.

Moreover, it is impossible to be certain until afterwards whether the shift
in the ratio represents a temporary divergence that will be corrected in
time, or the start of a fundamental structural break.

*TIMING DIFFERENCES*

In any case, the current divergence in gold and oil prices may not be as
irrational as it looks. It probably reflects differences between
institutional and retail investors about the timing of future inflation
rather than the probability.

Both types of investor have recently shown interest in commodities as a
hedge against inflation, currency depreciation and bank insolvencies.

But unlike large institutional investors, who can protect themselves from
inflation and currency risks through inflation and currency swaps,
inflation-protected government bonds, or futures positions in oil and
industrial metals, retail investors have fewer options. Owning physical gold
is one of the few ways they can protect capital in an inflationary
environment.

Much of the heightened interest in gold has come in forms favoured by retail
investors, such as coins, bars and holdings in exchange-traded funds (ETFs)
(which give private investors an opportunity to "own" physical gold more or
less directly through shares in a trust vehicle quoted on equity exchanges).

Different views about inflation embedded in gold and oil futures may
therefore mark different views between retail and institutional investors,
with the retail base more worried about an upturn in inflation, and
professional investors more sanguine.

It probably also captures differences about timing. The whole objective of
quantitative easing is to generate more inflation over time to counter the
deflationary tendencies within the economy as a result of the slump.

But an upturn in consumer prices is unlikely to occur until a cyclical
recovery is well underway, and could therefore be several years away.

Less sophisticated retail investors focused only on the longer-term
inflation threat risk piling into commodities too early, paying several
years worth of storage and financing costs (contango, or negative roll
yield) before seeing an eventual upturn. Institutional investors seem
content to wait until signs of a cyclical recovery and pick up of inflation
become more imminent.

Gold is also a much more convenient and cheaper way than crude oil to buy
medium-term protection from inflation.

Because of the huge storage charges, the cost of buying cheap oil at the
bottom of the cycle and financing and storing it until prices and inflation
pick up in two or three years time, is prohibitively high.
Gold is much easier and cheaper to store. The cost to buy gold or gold
futures now and hold them until inflation picks up is little more than the
cost of finance, which in a world of near-zero interest rates is almost nil.

For both retail and institutional investors, gold has therefore emerged as
the vehicle of choice for protecting capital against a deferred break out in
inflation rates in 2010-2012.

The stretched oil-gold ratio is a perfectly rational reflection of timing
differences (deflation in the short term, inflation in the long term) and
storage charges (high for oil, low for gold).

The current constellation of commodity prices does indeed send a carefully
coded warning about the prospects for a pick up in inflation — but not for
another 2-3 years.

-- 
Brad A. Bauerly
PhD Candidate,
Political Science
York University
Toronto, Canada
647-345-2072
bauerly@xxxxxxxx
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu