Re: [Marxism] Robert Fitch: only Marxism can explain the financialcrisis

["S. Artesian" <sartesian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Right.  If only Marx had been "simple"  and "common-sensical" enough to put 
that at the beginning of Capital,  Part 1, Chapter 1, Page 1, instead of at 
the end; instead of all that stuff about the commodity and value, why he 
could have saved himself all that complicated and non-common sense work of 
investigating the actual antagonisms of capital in all its metamorphoses.

And Charles, if only you had been born earlier, we could have had the 
Classic Comics version of Capital and saved so much time.

Reading Charles'  "defenses" of underconsumption-- in reality nothing but 
sophistry- makes me appreciate the "block sender" option.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Charles Brown" <cdb1003@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <sartesian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2009 7:56 AM
Subject: [Marxism] Robert Fitch: only Marxism can explain the 
financialcrisis


> CB; Then for some odd reason  this
> guy Karl Marx sticks
> that sound and simple common-sense
> argument right in the text in
> Volume III. Maybe he did it
> one night while out playing
> pool with the simple boys


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu