Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] The Left and Support For Islamic Resistance - an unsatisfying response
jscotlive -
You make this sound like a board game. Has it ever occurred to you that as
Marxists our enemy is at home, period, and that perhaps those regimes that
you
consider unsavoury have emerged from material conditions created by our own
imperialist governments?
The title of this thread reveals much about the Marxist understanding of
whoever started it. I wonder if during the Second World War Marxists around
the
world held discussions under such titles as 'The Left and Support For
Christian Resistance In France'.
Change the title to 'The Left and Support For Resistance' and you
substitute
Marxism for paternalism.
reply -
I was the one who sent in this article, decrying the lack of support and
solidarity from the left to Muslim communities and organizations under attack,
and I must say that the response on this list is deeply unsatisfying.
Because of the combination of political failure by the left and secular Arab
nationalist movements to link up to and provide solid leadership on the one
hand, and their repression by pro imperialist regimes on the other, there is a
political void. Religious Muslims have successfully filled this void and
are leading the struggle. Like it or not, this is reality - what do we do?
During WW 2, there was no such void. There was a strong left secular
resistance taking on the Nazi occupiers. But had there been no meaningful left,
if
that resistance had instead been as dominated by the Catholic Church as
today's anti imperialist resistance in the Arab world is by religious Muslims,
it
would have been the duty of all those opposed to the occupiers to support and
seek to become part of that resistance, even if we had to pose as Catholics,
while not abandoning our revolutionary perspectives. Anything else would be
sectarian abstentionism. And in the case of today's leftist Islamophobia, a
capitulation and adaptation to chauvinism dating back a thousand years to the
Crusades.
Why has the US/European left been so unable/unwilling to forge strong ties
to an oppressed and combative segment of its population - a natural ally? Is
this related to the notorious inability of the US left to become more
Black/Brown?
I ask comrades to read or re-read the original speech.
<_http://www.palestinechronicle.com/view_article_details.php?id=14818_
(http://www.palestinechronicle.com/view_article_details.php?id=14818) >
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy
steps!
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1218822736x1201267884/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=fe
bemailfooterNO62)
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] “FTA” a riveting documentary, (continued)
- [Marxism] Vatican: Darwin' s theory of evolution is compatible wit h Christianity,
Charles Brown Sun 15 Feb 2009, 18:05 GMT
- [Marxism] Internationalism Is Alive And Well,
Jscotlive Sun 15 Feb 2009, 17:22 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] The Left and Support For Islamic Resistance - an unsatisfying response,
Dbachmozart Sun 15 Feb 2009, 17:19 GMT
- [Marxism] Limits of Social Movements,
Louis Proyect Sun 15 Feb 2009, 15:03 GMT
- [Marxism] Lindsey Graham: We should not take nationalization off the table,
Louis Proyect Sun 15 Feb 2009, 14:56 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]