[Marxism] Dave Lindorff on third parties

[Eli Stephens <elishastephens@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

The Third-Party Delusion and the Need for a Mass Movement for Progressive Change

by Dave Lindorff

I can't count how many people have bombarded me with criticisms, usually laced 
with insults and often obscenities, when I have written articles calling for 
pressure on Democratic politicians to do the right thing, whether that is 
impeaching the last president and vice president for war crimes or in the case 
of our new president, standing and fighting for a people's bailout, instead of 
a Wall Street bailout.

The common refrain I hear is that the Democrats and Republicans are the same, 
and that we need a third party. Another common refrain is that "all you 
suckers" who voted for Obama are to blame. We should have voted for Cynthia 
McKinney and Ralph Nader, they say.

Now I have nothing against McKinney and Nader. That ticket would make for a 
wonderful administration, I agree. But I also have to point out that there is 
zero chance of these two people being elected in my lifetime (I'm 59 and pretty 
healthy) or theirs.

Third parties have not played a significant role in American politics since the 
1930s and earlier, when the Socialist Party of Eugene Debs (and Norman Thomas 
to a lesser extent) managed to make a significant dent in the political 
equation, though even it had no shot at winning. And that was back in a time 
when there were millions of immigrants from Europe who had socialist ideas in 
their blood, and when American workers were not afraid of the idea either.

Today, there is no mass base for a socialist party. Valiant efforts by some 
labor leaders like the late Ray Mazzochi to forge a Labor Party failed 
abysmally. The Green Party is a well-meaning but hopelessly internally 
fragmented group of people that has for years failed to appeal to any mass base 
and doesn't appear to have a clue of how to accomplish that.

I don't fault third parties for their failure to rise to a position of 
political relevance. The system of winner-take-all elections is structured 
against them. But calls to change that system so that third parties might have 
a chance bump up against the reality that the two parties that have a duopoly 
on power have no interest in changing the rules of the game to make it easier 
to bump them off. It simply ain't gonna happen.

This brings me to my main point, which is that all this formalistic arguing 
about the virtues of supporting a third party is an infantile diversion. 
Valuable energy is being wasted on trying to organize little parties which, 
because they are doomed to insignificance, end up being riven by petty internal 
power struggles (it has always been the case that the most bitter struggles for 
power occur in organizations with the least power and significance).

The truth is that enormous progressive change has been wrought in the US, 
within the two-party system, not by third parties coming to power, but by mass 
movements that have forced the more liberal of the two parties-the Democrats-to 
grudgingly do the right thing. It was a mass movement of workers that forced 
Franklin Roosevelt and the Democratic Party to establish the Social Security 
Program, and to pass labor laws making it easier for workers to organize. It 
was a mass movement that led to passage of the Civil Rights Act and that ended 
Jim Crow. It was a mass movement that helped bring an end to the US War in 
Indochina. It was a mass movement that led to the establishment of Medicare and 
Medicaid and other elements of the Johnson War on Poverty.

The people who criticize a policy of building a mass movement to pressure Obama 
and the Democrats to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, or to create a 
single-payer national health system, or to pass a progressive economic recovery 
program instead of a corporate bailout program, because it means dealing with 
the Democrats would probably have been criticizing Martin Luther King for 
seeking to pressure Johnson and the Democrats, for that is what Dr. King was 
doing-working within the two-party system, but by way of building a mass 
movement outside of party politics.

In a way, the obsession of some people on the left with third party politics is 
like a perfect safety valve to prevent real change within the Democratic Party. 
On the historic evidence, absent a powerful labor movement, which might permit 
the creation of a real Labor Party alternative as we had in the 1920s and 30s, 
third parties of the left have accomplished nothing except to draw support away 
from the Democrats and help elect conservative governments.

I know there are those, like Nader, who suggest that candidacies like his force 
Democrats running for office to adopt more liberal positions, but I see scant 
evidence of this. The most one can say is that a candidate like Al Gore, in 
order to prevent voters from straying to a Nader, might say a few more 
progressive things on the campaign trail, but once in office, such politicians 
quickly revert to form. Third party campaigns in the end accomplish very 
little, and yet can, in key states, as we saw in Florida in 2000, do a lot of 
harm. (I know, I know, the real vote went to Gore, but remember: if Nader 
hadn't run, there wouldn't have even had to be a recount, folks.)

So, while I expect to be deluged again with verbal brickbats, let me say it 
straight: third parties are a useless, and even dangerous diversion. What we 
need to be focusing on is building a mass movement for progressive change-a 
movement that will bring masses of people onto the streets, especially in 
Washington, but in every city and town, too, to demand an end to this country's 
pointless wars, a huge cut in the military budget, a national health care 
system, a jobs program, a break-up of the large banking and other corporate 
monopolies, an end to the national security state, reform of the labor laws, 
and a restoration of a real progressive tax system.

It is not third parties that make history in America. It is mass movements.

We need one badly. 

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: E-mail. Chat. Share. Get more ways to connect. 
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_AE_Faster_022009
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu