Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] Did Mega-Dam in China lead to earthquake?
DW:
The biggest single problem with the Chinese infrastructure projects is the
political disenfranchisement of public input, which, to my knowledge, is
non-existent.
LD:
Not to defend the CCP's brand of authoritarian capitalism (too simplistic a
descriptor in any event), but the planning and operation of large scale and
technically complex infrastructure projects is always the sternest test of
democratic accountability, regardless of the mode of production. Whatever
his theoretical limitations Donald Worster in Rivers of Empire makes a good
case for the inherent connections between huge and complicated projects and
top-down bureaucracy. Yeah, I know, my Weberian Marxist slip is showing ;)
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] Did Mega-Dam in China lead to earthquake?, (continued)
- Re: [Marxism] Did Mega-Dam in China lead to earthquake?,
Mark Lause Fri 06 Feb 2009, 14:45 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Did Mega-Dam in China lead to earthquake?,
nada Fri 06 Feb 2009, 15:22 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Did Mega-Dam in China lead to earthquake?,
Larry Damms Fri 06 Feb 2009, 17:15 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Did Mega-Dam in China lead to earthquake?,
nada Fri 06 Feb 2009, 18:06 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Did Mega-Dam in China lead to earthquake?,
Larry Damms Fri 06 Feb 2009, 21:54 GMT
- [Marxism] Le Monde reports on LCR/NPA,
Louis Proyect Fri 06 Feb 2009, 14:12 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]