Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[Marxism] Panetta approves of "tougher" interrogation methods and renditions



NY Times, February 6, 2009
Panetta Open to Tougher Methods in Some C.I.A. Interrogation
By MARK MAZZETTI

WASHINGTON — Leon E. Panetta, the White House pick to lead the Central
Intelligence Agency, on Thursday left open the possibility that the
agency could seek permission to use interrogation methods more
aggressive than the limited menu that President Obama authorized under
new rules issued last month.

Under insistent questioning from a Senate panel, Mr. Panetta said that
in extreme cases, if interrogators were unable to extract critical
information from a terrorism suspect, he would seek White House approval
for the C.I.A. to use methods that would go beyond those permitted under
the new rules.

“If we had a ticking bomb situation, and obviously, whatever was being
used I felt was not sufficient, I would not hesitate to go to the
president of the United States and request whatever additional authority
I would need,” Mr. Panetta said in his nomination hearing before the
Senate Intelligence Committee.

He gave no specifics about what interrogation methods he would suggest,
but he said that the agency would always abide by the law. He also said
he believed that interrogators could reliably get information from
detainees using noncoercive means.

“We can protect this country, we can get the information we need, we can
provide for the security of the American people and we can abide by the
law,” Mr. Panetta said. “I’m absolutely convinced that we can do that.”

Mr. Panetta would inherit a spy agency governed by rules somewhat more
restrictive than under President George W. Bush, because of the
executive orders issued by Mr. Obama last month that would shut agency
prisons and require agency interrogators, for the time being, to abide
by the same noncoercive interrogation techniques as those used by the
military.

Some critics of the new administration, including former Vice President
Dick Cheney, have said that limiting the agency’s role in
counterterrorism could backfire and leave the United States more open to
a terrorist attack.

In his testimony, Mr. Panetta said that under the rules issued by Mr.
Obama, the C.I.A. is still allowed to detain and question terrorism
suspects before transferring them to a military jail. But he said that
unlike during the Bush administration, the International Committee of
the Red Cross would be granted access to C.I.A. prisoners.

Mr. Panetta also said the agency would continue the Bush administration
practice of “rendition” — picking terrorism suspects off the street and
sending them to a third country. But he said the agency would refuse to
deliver a suspect into the hands of a country known for torture or other
actions “that violate our human values.”

A task force appointed by Mr. Obama is to investigate whether any
interrogation methods beyond those currently allowed ought to be
approved. Mr. Panetta did not hesitate Thursday to label as torture the
interrogation technique known as waterboarding, which C.I.A.
interrogators used on three terrorism suspects in 2002 and 2003 and has
since prohibited.

But Mr. Panetta said no agency operatives should be prosecuted for
waterboarding — which induces the feeling of drowning — or any other
interrogation method that had been authorized by the Justice Department.

Before the same Senate panel last month, Dennis C. Blair, who is now the
director of national intelligence, declined to say that waterboarding is
torture, telling senators that it would be awkward for him to lead
intelligence operatives he had accused of carrying out an illegal act.

For years, C.I.A. officials have argued that the agency’s detention and
interrogation program not only helped thwart terrorist attacks, but also
was the government’s most valuable resource for gaining insight into Al
Qaeda.

Mr. Panetta pledged to examine the harsh interrogation techniques used
by the spy agency after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks to determine whether
any damage done to America’s reputation abroad “counterbalanced” the
intelligence gained during the interrogations.

Although the C.I.A. can no longer hold prisoners indefinitely, and can
no longer hide prisoners from the Red Cross, the exact rules governing
agency detention operations remain murky. For instance, Mr. Obama has
yet to spell out exactly how long the C.I.A. can detain a prisoner, and
how long a detainee can be in C.I.A. custody before the agency notifies
the Red Cross.

Obama administration officials said the agency was likely to follow a
Pentagon rule that requires Red Cross notification within a few weeks of
a prisoner’s capture.

Mr. Panetta is scheduled to testify further on Friday, but is expected
to be easily confirmed by the Senate, which would make him the final
member of Mr. Obama’s national security team to join the administration.
Mr. Obama did not choose him for the job until early January, after
other candidates for the job were passed over because of their
association with controversial Bush administration counterterrorism
policies.

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]