[Marxism] Fidel: Contradictions Between Obama’s Politics and Ethics

[Eli Stephens <elishastephens@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Somebody has to do it in Walter's absence ;-)

A few days ago I referred to some of Obama’s ideas which point to his role in a 
system that denies every principle of justice.

Some throw their hands up in horror if anything is said to criticize the 
important personality, even if it is done with decency and respect. This is 
usually accompanied by subtle and not so subtle darts from those with the means 
to throw and transform them into the elements of media terror imposed on the 
peoples to sustain the unsustainable.

Every criticism I make is always construed as an attack, an accusation and 
other similar qualifiers reflecting callousness and discourtesy towards the 
person involved.

This time I’d rather address some questions of many that could be raised and 
that the new President of the United States should answer.

The following for example:

Whether or not he renounces his prerogative as President of the United States 
--that his predecessors with few exceptions exercised as a right per se-- to 
order the assassination of a foreign political adversary usually coming from an 
underdeveloped country?

By any chance, has any of his many assistants ever informed him of the sinister 
actions carried out by former presidents from the days of Eisenhower through 
the years 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, and 1967 against Cuba, 
including the mercenary Bay of Pigs [Giron] invasion, the terror campaigns, the 
introduction to our territory of a great amount of weapons and ammunitions, and 
other similar actions?

It is not my intention to blame the current President of the United States, 
Barack Obama, for actions conducted by former presidents when he had not been 
born or when he was just a 6-years-old boy born in Hawaii to a black Moslem 
Kenyan fathers and a white Christian American mother. On the contrary, this is 
an exceptional merit of the U.S. society and I am the first to admit it.

Is President Obama aware that for decades our country was the victim of 
deliberately introduced viruses and bacteria carrying diseases and plagues 
which affected people, animals and plants? Does he know that some of them like 
the Hemorrhagic Dengue Fever later became a scourge that took the lives of 
thousands of children in Latin America and that other plagues impinge on the 
economy of the peoples of the Caribbean and the rest of the continent as 
collateral damages that have yet to be removed?

Does he know that several politically submissive Latin American countries, 
which are today embarrassed by all the damages they caused, also took part in 
such terrorist and economically harmful actions?

Why is our country the only one in the world enduring the imposition of a 
disrupting Cuban Adjustment Act which promotes trafficking in persons and other 
events that take the lives of people, mostly women and children?

Was it fair to impose on our people an economic blockade lasting almost 50 
years?

Was it right to arbitrarily demand from the world to accept the 
extraterritorial application of this economic blockade which can only bring 
hunger and shortages to the people?

The United States cannot meet its vital needs without extracting large mineral 
resources from a great number of countries often limited in their exports of 
them by the intermediate process of refining. In general, when it is convenient 
to the interests of the empire, these products are traded by big transnational 
companies operating with Yankee capital.

Will that country renounce such privileges?

Would that renunciation be compatible with the developed capitalist system?

When Mr. Obama promises to make large investments to be self-reliant in oil, 
despite the fact that his country is today the largest market in the world, 
what could the future be of those countries whose main revenues come from 
exporting that energy as many of them lack any other significant source of 
income?

After the crisis, once the competition and the fight over the markets and 
sources of employment is unleashed again, as it is usually the case among those 
who are better off and more efficient in the monopoly of that technology with 
sophisticated means of production, what possibilities will be left to the not 
developed countries dreaming of industrialization?

The efficiency of the new vehicles manufactured by the auto industry 
notwithstanding, will they use the procedure demanded by the ecology to protect 
Humanity from the increasing deterioration of the climate?

Will the blind philosophy of the market be able to replace that which only 
rationality could promote?

Obama promises to mint enormous amounts of money to foster the quest for 
technologies that can multiply the production of energy whose absence would 
paralyze modern societies.

He includes the nuclear power plants among the sources of energy he promises to 
hastily develop. These are already opposed by a high number of people due to 
the high risks of accidents with disastrous consequences for life, the 
atmosphere and human food. It is absolutely impossible to prevent the 
occurrence of some of these accidents.

Modern industry has already contaminated all the seas on the planet with the 
release of toxins, even without such accidental disasters.

Can the conciliation of such contradictory and antagonistic interests be 
rightly promised without transgressing ethics?

The U.S. House of Representatives with a Democratic majority launched the 
extremely protectionist slogan of “buy US goods”, to please the unions that 
supported his campaign. This tramples on a basic principle of the World Trade 
Organization, since every nation in the world, be they big or small, dream of 
their development based on trading goods and services; however, only the big 
and rich among them have the privilege to survive to realize such dream.

The Republicans in the United States, discredited by the actions of the 
reckless Bush administration, soon reacted against the measures taken by Obama 
to please his allies in the unions. Thus is wasted the credit given by the 
voters to the new President of the United States.

As an old politician and fighter I commit no sin by modestly exposing these 
ideas.

As hundreds of news from the political, scientific and technological circles 
are published every day, many questions could be raised for which there are not 
easy answers.

Fidel Castro Ruz

February 4, 2009

_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. 
http://windowslive.com/howitworks?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_howitworks_022009
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu