[Marxism] What was (is) Israel's purpose in assaulting Gaza?

[Eli Stephens <elishastephens@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Links and formatting in the original:
http://lefti.blogspot.com/2009_01_01_archive.html#5554924531271862432

With a temporary lull in Israel's assault on Gaza, and, as predicted, dozens if 
not hundreds of bodies being pulled from the rubble, it's an appropriate time 
to ask, what was the purpose of this assault? Israel claims it was to "stop 
rocket firing," and no doubt they did attempt to destroy smuggling tunnels and 
kill some Hamas fighters. But the current totals of dead - 1206 Palestinians 
including 415 children, 110 women and 115 elderly - not to mention the targets 
of the attack - hospitals, schools, UN headquarters, food warehouses - have to 
cause one to question more deeply. More than 50% of the dead were civilians not 
including a single adult male, meaning that the real civilian casualties are 
probably in the 75% range at least. Tens or hundreds of thousands of civilians 
are homeless, there homes having been demolished by Israeli attacks. Such 
things do not happen by "accident," and they don't happen because Hamas 
militants just "happen" to be firing rockets or conducting sniper attacks from 
inside or nearby such targets. They happen deliberately.

No doubt some of the time Israeli tanks were indeed firing at snipers etc. But 
one has to think about that. Who picked the battlefield? Hamas snipers don't 
fire at people in Sderot. Hamas snipers and other fighters were resisting the 
invasion of their land, and of course they have to do so by being in the same 
place as the invaders. So when a tank was in position to fire at a Hamas 
militant in front of, say, a school (if indeed that ever happened), it happened 
because the tank came to the school in the first place (and, obviously, because 
the tank entered Gaza in the first place).

But in the end, one can only conclude that the destruction of civilians and 
civilian infrastructure was a deliberate result of, and indeed goal of, the 
invasion. Of course this can't be proved without the secret minutes of the 
Israeli cabinet. But it is a reasonable conclusion, and that conclusion isn't 
just based on the results. We have to recall that for nearly two years prior to 
the assault, ever since the election of Hamas, making civilians suffer 
("putting them on a diet" in the arrogant and infamous words of Olmert adviser 
Dov Weinglass) has been a proudly stated policy of Israel. And, we must note, 
that policy, while enforced on the ground by Israel, has been aggressively 
seconded and promoted politically at the U.N. and around the world by the U.S., 
U.K., and their allies.

As an aside, I mentioned above the destruction of some of the smuggling 
tunnels, and no doubt those tunnels have been used to smuggle in weapons to 
Gaza. But they have also, and primarily, been used to smuggle in vital goods 
including food and fuel into Gaza, and have formed a vital part of the thin 
line keeping Gazans alive. Their destruction can also be seen as part of a 
strategy to increase the pain on the civilian population.

But after nearly two years, and more than 241 Palestian patients (and probably 
a lot more) dead directly as a result of the Israeli seige and the 
unavailability of medicine and/or medical care (and, of course, far more pain 
experienced by the Palestinian population beyond that one statistic, thanks to 
the wholesale destruction of the Palestinian economy caused by the blockade), 
that diet had succeeded in punishing the Palestinian people almost beyond 
belief, but hadn't done a thing to dent Hamas' popularity. It was time to 
escalate the pain, and make the Palestinian people really suffer, and die, in 
the hope that that would finally push Hamas from power and enable the 
installation of a pliant client like Abbas who would be willing to finally 
agree to humiliating terms for a two-state settlement, with the wall, 
Israeli-only roads, checkpoints, etc. remaining in place in the West Bank, 
along with all the major settlements and probably many of the minor ones as 
well, sacrificing only the "illegal" (as if they aren't all illegal) 
"outposts." And even if the result wasn't/isn't immediate in terms of ousting 
Hamas, now there is speculation that all the rebuilding money (such as it will 
be, doled out with an eyedropper) will be funneled through Fatah and the PA, 
thus supposedly ingratiating themselves to the population of Gaza.

Is this a strategy likely to succeed? I would say it's highly unlikely. So why 
did the Israelis pursue this strategy? Because they had no better option.


Eli Stephens
 Left I on the News
 http://lefti.blogspot.com


_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_t1_allup_explore_012009
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu