Re: [Marxism] Army finally admits coverup of Nazi treatment

[Barry Brooks <durable@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mark Lause wrote:
> Michael Friedman <mikedf@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Maybe I'm stupid, but this still doesn't explain the
>> specifics to me. Was the cover-up to avoid embarassment
>> of Nazi-turned-U.S. lackeys?

Yes.

Cover-ups have many purposes and may have no reasons beyond 
following methods of secrecy and control. To maintain 
consent facts must be contained until selected and painted.

I don't think that it's blue-skying speculation to say that
Nazis were in competition with other would-be rulers of the
world. As competitors for the same niche the Nazis were
opposed by the allies, but as fanatic anti-communists they
were family to all capitalists... to be reunited with...
and protected.

Barry









________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu