Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Chavismo takes a hit
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081222/cuadros?rel=hp_currently
Chavismo Takes a Hit
By Alexander Cuadros
December 5, 2008
On Sunday, Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez made two bold
declarations. He announced his intention to press ahead with a
constitutional referendum that would do away with presidential term
limits--one year after voters narrowly rejected a similar reform--and
demanded that Colombia immediately withdraw its consul in Maracaibo,
Venezuela's second-largest city. "Either they take him out of here or
I'll throw him out," Chávez said.
A secretly recorded conversation between consul Carlos Galvis Fajardo
and an adviser to Colombian President Álvaro Uribe had been broadcast
the day before on the state-run television channel, VTV. Galvis spoke
of his satisfaction with the results of Venezuela's regional
elections on November 23, in which opposition candidates won, among
other prizes, the governorship of the oil-rich state of Zulia and the
mayor's seat in its capital, Maracaibo. Though the conversation
revealed no substantive evidence of Colombian meddling in Venezuelan
territory, the VTV presenter assured viewers that "their objective is
clear: to infiltrate with assassins and paramilitaries, something
that Manuel Rosales"--the outgoing two-term governor of Zulia, now
mayor-elect of Maracaibo--"is up to his eyebrows in."
At least on the surface, Chávez's two characteristically gutsy moves
that day might seem unrelated. Yet they both serve his goal to hold
onto power amid tumbling oil revenues, steadily deteriorating public
services, and skyrocketing inflation and crime. (Inflation in
Venezuela is the highest in Latin America, and according to The
Economist, the homicide rate has tripled there in the last ten
years.) In December of 2006, Chávez ran against Rosales for the
presidency and won by twenty-six points--a landslide. But in the
regional elections last month, gubernatorial candidates for the PSUV,
Chávez's party, won just 52.5 percent of the popular vote nationwide.
Out of Venezuela's twenty-three states, the opposition now controls
five, along with the mayor's seat in Caracas--and together these
account for 40 percent of the country's population.
Chávez had led a dogged campaign in the preceding weeks to discredit
Rosales and his protégé Pablo Pérez, who won the governorship of
Zulia. Still, even after Chávez vowed to throw Rosales in jail for
alleged corruption, claimed to have evidence the opposition leader
was planning to assassinate him, and called him (among other things)
a "tumor in the body of Zulia state," Rosales won the mayoralty in
Maracaibo by more than twenty points. As Chávez, undaunted, continues
his quest to undermine opposition legitimacy, many are now asking the
question: Is Chavismo finally on the wane?
Maracaibo is a charmless sprawl of 3 million people not far from the
Colombian border, and popular wisdom maintains that it is the hottest
city in Venezuela--on a cloudless day, it can be sweltering by 8 a.m.
It also produces about half of the country's oil. Every day off the
shores of Lake Maracaibo you can see massive tankers lumbering in and
out, weighed down by thick Venezuelan crude.
The PSUV's Giancarlo DiMartino was Maracaibo's mayor for the past
eight years, and on November 23 he lost by about eight points in his
bid against Pérez for the governorship of Zulia. After DiMartino's
final campaign rally in a poor neighborhood called El Marite in the
northwest of Maracaibo, I spoke to residents milling about on lumpy
asphalted streets that slowly gave way to mud. Sitting on an
upside-down bucket in front of a modest barred-in house, a
28-year-old welder named Luís Castro told me, referring to DiMartino:
"You can see that the man has done things for the neighborhood. It's
safer. This area was too dangerous. The streets were dark, and he put
in street lamps--now you can walk around at night." He and other
residents also emphasized the recent establishment of local
"missions"--government-funded community centers that provide, among
other things, education and medical assistance. There is a hospital
nearby, but residents could rarely afford the fees; now they are
treated for free at a clinic manned by Cuban doctors. Hospital El
Marite, however, like many hospitals throughout Venezuela, has
deteriorated in recent years. Castro told me that now people call it
"El Morite," which basically means that as far as locals are
concerned, it is a place you go to die.
Even as many of Venezuela's poorest have seen their lives improve,
mismanagement and corruption have become hallmarks of Chávez's
government. In Maracaibo, residents complained to me that with
DiMartino as mayor, the city's once-efficient system of garbage
collection had at times completely broken down; trash could pile up
for days. There were often shortages of coffee, milk and sugar. In
some poor neighborhoods like El Marite people claimed to have seen
crime drop, but people in the rest of the city assured me that it was
worse than ever, and that sometimes the municipal police failed to
respond when called. Public works are in a half-finished state
throughout the city. Two days before the election, DiMartino
inaugurated a "community prevention center" that would have put
police in a crime-ridden neighborhood in the south, but the parking
lots had yet to be paved and the offices were empty of equipment.
The most extravagant example of mismanagement is the Maracaibo Metro,
for which construction began in 2004. According to government
figures, more than $700 million has been spent building Line One. But
only four of the six stations are operational, and just 2,500 people
ride it every day. When I drove by in a taxi one night at rush hour,
the polished, well-lit stations, adorned with modern-looking inverted
arches and enclosed on either side by high chain-link fences, were
almost completely empty of passengers. Worse, the two and a half
miles of aboveground tracks have essentially walled off two parts of
the city from each other, as there are no bridges or tunnels along
the entire stretch. Businesses have failed all along the Metro
because of the reduced client base, and dozens of homes have been
destroyed by poorly planned construction.
It is not just the middle class that is against Chávez, as opposition
victories in former Chavista strongholds such as the Caracas slum of
Petare show. On election day in Maracaibo I met a young woman who
works at a Bolivarian high school, as she waited to vote in a poor
neighborhood called Santo Domingo in the south of the city. She had
supported Chávez until last year's constitutional reform, which in
addition to eliminating presidential term limits would also have
given Chávez the power to create new federal and municipal
regions--parallel to democratically elected governments--for which he
could handpick the leaders and assign new budgets. (This measure, and
a slew of others rejected by voters in the referendum, were passed by
decree in July of this year.) She said, "What Chávez wants is to keep
himself in power, but one person alone can't govern a country. I
support him in some things, but not in everything." These were things
she could not speak of freely at the school, she said, for fear of
losing her job.
Margarita López Maya, a historian at the Central University of
Venezuela, told me in a telephone interview that Venezuelans were
tired of polarization. She lamented the "impoverished discourse" on
both sides. It is an argument, she said, framed either in terms of
unwavering support for the president or an abstract idea of
"democracy" that ultimately boils down to voting against Chávez
rather than voting for a coherent alternative vision.
Perhaps more important than the question of whether Chávez's support
is waning--a point on which analysts I spoke to disagree--is whether
there is any way to bridge the chasm between the two camps. There are
"dissident" elements that made a relatively strong showing in the
regional elections, but López Maya said she was pessimistic about a
third way. "You have the opposition members who were visible during
the coup and the oil strike"--in 2002, the opposition followed a
failed two-day coup with an oil strike that paralyzed the economy for
months--"and these sectors are highly discredited." She went on, "I
honestly don't see Manuel Rosales as an attractive person for the
popular sectors who might want to begin to leave the officialist
side." These are "disenchanted" people, she said, for whom "Chávez's
government has become very weak in terms of its inability, for so
many years, to fulfill its expectations and promises, in terms of its
corruption, the level of crime in the cities." But there is still no
one to represent them. "These are dark times," she said.
I recalled my conversation with DiMartino, the perpetually sunburned,
heavyset Chavista mayor, a couple of days before the election. Under
the flourescent glare of a little back room at the local station for
VTV, I asked him why he thought that two local Bolivarian
Circles--Chavista social organizations--had swung their support from
him to the opposition candidates. He called them "mercenaries" and
said, "They're the typical individuals who take advantage of
campaigns to earn fifty, sixty million Bolívares. We're talking about
$20,000." So they were bribed? "Yes." And there's proof? "Yes, of
course," he assured me. I did not get to see this proof, but when I
spoke to Edwin Méndez, a spokesperson for one of the two Circles,
together representing about 9,000 people, he told me he had withdrawn
his support because the municipal government had completely shut them
out and ignored their requests for assistance with community
projects. He still supports Chávez.
I asked DiMartino if it was possible to continue supporting the
president, as Méndez does, but not support his candidates at a local
level. "It's a contradiction," he said. "We're talking about black
and white here."
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] Angry laid-off workers occupy factory in Chicago,
Matthew Russo Sat 06 Dec 2008, 16:24 GMT
- [Marxism] for nationwide pickets at Bank of America to support UE occupation!,
Andrew Pollack Sat 06 Dec 2008, 15:15 GMT
- [Marxism] Cliff Conner/Bill Ayers,
Louis Proyect Sat 06 Dec 2008, 14:34 GMT
- [Marxism] Chavismo takes a hit,
Louis Proyect Sat 06 Dec 2008, 14:04 GMT
- [Marxism] Proposition 8--the musical,
Louis Proyect Sat 06 Dec 2008, 13:27 GMT
- [Marxism] The return of socialism,
Louis Proyect Sat 06 Dec 2008, 12:58 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Seymour/Ayers - rewriting history?,
Ethan Young Sat 06 Dec 2008, 06:28 GMT
- [Marxism] Radio Interview Today,
michael perelman Sat 06 Dec 2008, 04:19 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]