Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] Re: NYT: Chávez Again Seeks to End Term Limits
Steven L. Robinson wrote:
"In the context of the US, where the major parties design the electoral
system so as to assure their leading figures remain in power forever
through gerrymandering, ballot access restrictions, etc, term limits
have some benefit in that they at least force a rotation of personnel.
In California, at least, this has resulted in the election of
individuals more liberal or to the left of those that would have held
the positions had there been no term limits. Compare for instance,
California state legislators , where there are term limits, to the
Congressional delegation, where there are none. For instance, in San
Francisco in the state legislator we have two progressives, Leno and
Ammiano, the lattter identifies himself as a socialist, while in
Congress, we have two machine pols, Pelosi and Speir. Were term limits
applied to Congress, we would almost certainly have, on balance, more
progressive, or at least representatives more responsive to the
electorate."
This is a bogus comparison. The force of ruling class opinion is bound to be
much stronger and more important the higher up one goes. There are numerous
Greens elected at local office; none in Congress. This has nothing to do with
term limits. And there is no evidence that I know of that the imposition of
term limits in California some years ago has moved the State Legislature to the
left.
What it HAS done is increased enormously the power of lobbyists, i.e.,
business, since they are the "permanent" residents of Sacramento, whereas the
legislators are mere transients, spending half their time there just learning
the ropes before it's time for them to go. The imposition of term limits in
California was a *right-wing* measure.
Eli Stephens
Left I on the News
http://lefti.blogspot.com
_________________________________________________________________
Suspicious message? There’s an alert for that.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_broad2_122008
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] NYT: ChÃvez Again Seeks to End Term Limits,
Walter Lippmann Wed 03 Dec 2008, 20:03 GMT
- [Marxism] LA TIMES: "For the U.N., a clean break" (editorial),
Walter Lippmann Wed 03 Dec 2008, 19:52 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] NYT: Chávez Again Seeks to End Term Limits,
nada Wed 03 Dec 2008, 18:49 GMT
- [Marxism] Re: NYT: Chávez Again Seeks to End Term Limits,
Eli Stephens Wed 03 Dec 2008, 18:46 GMT
- [Marxism] Liberal and New Democrat Coalition Accord and Economic Policy,
Richard Menec Wed 03 Dec 2008, 17:23 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Munbai: Why this violent counterattack by the Indian army?,
Marla Vijaya kumar Wed 03 Dec 2008, 17:20 GMT
- [Marxism] Pentagon officials report strongest recruiting season in four years,
Richard Menec Wed 03 Dec 2008, 17:10 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]