Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[Marxism] The Wall Street Coup and the Bailout Scam



The Wall Street Coup and the Bailout Scam
by Ismael Hossein-zadeh

The "rescue" plan is not only fraudulent, it is also the wrong
medicine for the ailing economy.

The Wall Street took the US (and the world) hostage and extracted a
heavy ransom. But while the enormous ransom was successfully
extracted, there are no guarantees that the hostages will be set free
from the shackles of trickle-down economics. On the contrary, there
are strong indications that the fraudulent (and perhaps criminal)
bailout may turn the current crisis into a protracted agony of a
long-bleeding economic depression.

Why the Bailout Scam Is More Likely to Fail than to Succeed

The bailout scam is doomed to fail because it avoids diagnosis and
dodges the heart of the problem: the inability of more than five
million homeowners to pay their fraudulently inflated mortgage obligations.

Instead of trying to salvage the threatened real assets or homes and
save their owners from becoming homeless, the bailout scheme is
trying to salvage the phony or fictitious assets of Wall Street
gamblers and reward their sins by sending taxpayers' good money after
the gamblers' bad money. It focuses on the wrong end of the problem.

The apparent rationale for the bailout plan is that, while the
injection of tax payers' money into the Wall Street casino may not be
fair, it is a necessary evil that will free the "troubled assets" and
create liquidity in the financial markets, thereby triggering a
much-needed wave of lending, borrowing, and expansion.

There are at least five major problems with this argument.

The first major problem is that the current financial disaster is not
really a liquidity problem as it is repeatedly portrayed to be. It
is a problem of faith and trust, or lack thereof, which in turn stems
from the disproportionately large amount of junk assets or mortgages
relative to real assets. It is true that lending and credit
expansion has almost come to a halt and, in this sense, there is a
serious liquidity crisis. But this illiquidity is not really due to
a lack of good money or real assets in the system. It is rather
because owners of such valuable assets are unwilling to lend their
precious possessions to owners of troubled assets, or worthless papers.

As Herman E. Daly, University of Maryland economist, puts it, "The
value of present real wealth is no longer sufficient to serve as a
lien to guarantee the exploding debt. Consequently the debt is being
devalued in terms of existing wealth. No one any longer is eager to
trade real present wealth for debt even at high interest rates. This
is because the debt is worth much less, not because there is not
enough money or credit."

The second major problem with the bailout scheme is that it is simply
unfeasible and ineffectual because there is just not enough good
money to redeem all the bad money that has ballooned or bubbled to a
multiple of the good money and/or real assets.

full: http://mrzine.monthlyreview.org/hossein-zadeh111008.html


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]