Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] An open letter to our Cubaholic [was: Cuba policy as a U.S. domestic political issue]
- To: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [Marxism] An open letter to our Cubaholic [was: Cuba policy as a U.S. domestic political issue]
- From: David Thorstad <binesi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:33:57 -0500
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)
Joaquin Bustelo wrote:
> "Supporting" foreign revolutions played a most negative role in the
> degeneration of the SWP from 1978 on. Mindless cheerleading for the "three
> giants of the Caribbean" --Cuba, Grenada and Nicaragua-- was the opium of
> the cadre, distracting them from what SHOULD have held their attention,
> which was the way the SWP was losing hundreds of people and becoming
> completely isolated by staying outside such progressive social and protest
> movements as existed.
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I find much of Joaquin's contributions insightful and intelligent, so
this latest one piqued my curiosity. He seems to believe the SWP's
"degeneration" got going in 1978. (I apologize if I'm surmising too much
here, but he gave the date of 1978.) I've given some thought to this
question, but am not committed to my own views, and am curious to know
how he picks 1978 as the turning point date of degeneration.
I do not disagree that the SWP degenerated, but suspect it began
much earlier. I wonder if people who remained members of the SWP until
they either were expelled in the early 1980s (I know a number of such
people, from various tendencies) or decided short of expulsion (e.g.,
Peter Camejo) that the party had become a has-been under the one-armed
bandit Barnes see the degeneration as having begun shortly before they
saw the light or were shown the door.
The Spartacists, for example, trace the degeneration of the SWP way
back to prior to times I myself joined (1967), and some of the documents
they have published, going back to the 1930s, are illuminating in this
regard. In some ways, I think they were prescient about the future
degeneration of the SWP, surely after 1965, with the adoption of the
antidemocratic, bureaucratic, Stalinoid organization resolution and
policy attributed to Farrell Dobbs. It was that policy, in my
understanding (I'd be happy to be disabused by persons who might know
more than I do about the subject)--which was never, to my knowledge,
ever presented and critiqued and analyzed in any SWP educational while I
was a member (1967-1973)--that ultimately led to the expulsion of many
members, including some top and longtime leaders of the party (e.g.,
Frank Lovell, George Breitman...), grotesquely, by the Barnes clique and
the remaining many hand-raisers. Some, perhaps most, of these people
themselves participated in earlier expulsions of comrades whose
violations of Barnes's or Dobbs's norms were no more demonstrable than
their own. Not only that, many later expulsees raised their hands
enthusiastically to support things like the ridiculous "Memorandum" on
homosexuality adopted overwhelmingly by the convention in 1973. I myself
saw that as a sign of degeneration and dishonesty and arm-twisting and
violation of alleged party norms (no "buttonholing" of other comrades
during preconvention discussions, for example, something that the SWP
Barnes clique majority did all the time without any censure or concern
by the majority comrades, who looked the other way, until years later it
came up to bite them in the ass), and quit the party in 1973.
I raise this merely because it seems relevant in view of Joaquin's
date fixing for the degenerative process.
In a few days, I will have posted my polemic against the SWP from
1979--"The Socialist Workers Party vs. Gay Liberation (or The Cuckoo
Builds a Strange Nest)--and will send a link to the list for those who
might be interested. The article addresses issues of degeneration, the
"turn to industry," which in my view was part of the degeneration, even
though it wasn't much, if at all, challenged within the party at the time.
These issues may not be of earth-shaking importance, and the SWP is
now irrelevant by any measure, but they are interesting and pertinent,
as Joaquin's comment makes clear.
David
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] An open letter to our Cubaholic [was: Cuba policy asaU.S. domestic political issue], (continued)
- [Marxism] PSUV youth founding congress - revolutionary youth fighting for the future,
Stuart Munckton Sun 21 Sep 2008, 09:52 GMT
- [Marxism] Latin America: "Don't mess with us",
Stuart Munckton Sun 21 Sep 2008, 09:40 GMT
- [Marxism] Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions: Power-sharing deal `a far cry' from expectations | Links,
glparramatta Sun 21 Sep 2008, 08:38 GMT
- [Marxism] WSJ: In Turmoil, Capitalism in U.S. Sets New Course,
Walter Lippmann Sun 21 Sep 2008, 02:50 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]