Re: [Marxism] An open letter to our Cubaholic [was: Cuba policy as a U.S. domestic political issue]

[Kai <killakai@xxxxxxxxx>]

The issue isn't whether the list is open to foreigners or not, it is
about whether policy towards cuba is foreign policy or domestic
policy. This is a question with an obvious answer no matter how much
people who care about the Cuban revolution may protest. This isn't
about where one stands on Cuba, this is about what constitutes
domestic policy. If a foreign country can be said to be a part of
domestic policy then certainly at least Israel (as others have already
suggested) and Mexico would meet that criteria ahead of Cuba. The
issue you have raised along with the issue that sparked this thread
both have very obvious answers.

On 9/21/08, Lüko Willms <lueko.willms@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 02:38:16 -0400, Joaquin Bustelo wrote:
>
>>      Cuba is not a "domestic" political issue, not in the sense
> that
>> ANYONE uses this term. It is a "foreign policy" issue. It deals
> with
>> relations with a country OUTSIDE the U.S.
>
>   Is this list a US-only, domestic list?
>
>   Should we foreigners all unsubscribe?
>
>
> Worried,
> Lüko Willms
> Frankfurt, Germany
> --------------------------------
>
> ________________________________________________
> YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
> Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Set your options at:
> http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/killakai%40gmail.com
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu