Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] fiasco
Need to amend something, when I state the price of oil did not weaken the
economy, I mean it did not do so automatically, immediately, or
unilaterally. The original price increase of 1999 served to hyper-inflate
the economy and was part of the response to a fall in return on investment
indicative of the prior period of overproduction and over-accumulation.
The post 2002 recovery, accompanied by war and a resumption in the increase
in the price of oil was accompanied by restored profitability based on
reduced investment, increased fixed asset consumption, reduced labor. 2005,
2006 see a jump in fixed asset spending, another peak in return on
investment and... the stage is set for the hyperinflation of oil prices,
with its usual impact on auto, airline, and transportation industries.
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] fiasco, (continued)
- [Marxism] Bailout means more poverty, poorer health for working people,
Fred Feldman Sat 20 Sep 2008, 01:56 GMT
- [Marxism] Is Wall Street's pneumonia making the world sneeze?,
Walter Lippmann Sat 20 Sep 2008, 01:16 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Peter Camejo died this morning, September 13, 2008,
Mark Lause Sat 20 Sep 2008, 00:44 GMT
- [Marxism] For the "I Wish It Could Be True" Category,
Jay Moore Fri 19 Sep 2008, 23:30 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]