Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: [Marxism] Early notes on the present financial crisis




Some answers.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Shane Hopkinson" <chen9692000@xxxxxxxxx>


* When Fannie and Freddie were 'nationalised' that means that working class
people who hold mortgages lose their houses (?), that stockholders (which
would be big capitalists) have their assets protected (along with directors
jobs as Fannie/Freddie) courtesy of the taxpayer (who would get that bailout
loan repaid IF they ever make any money again - which they won't). Socialism
for the rich?
__________________

Nobody is losing their houses simply because of the seizure of the GSE's.
Default and foreclosure rates are increasing due to the overall collapse of
the housing market, the increase in rates of the adjustable rate mortgages,
and the GSE's increased role in issuing mortgages as the private mortgage
issuers contract.

Stockholders, both of the common stock, and preferred stock will not have
their assets protected. They are considered owners and thus their shares do
not represent a contractual obligation upon the company. The direct debt
that the GSE's have issued, along with the securitized mortgage packages,
are considered contractual obligations, and the implicit "full faith and
credit of the US govt" in the GSE's status now has been made explicit. The
executives of the GSE's most assuredly won't wind up applying for food
stamps.
__________________
>
> * There was a special trading day on Sunday - to allow Lehmann to trade
> derivatives. Now what why is this? Who would trade with Lehmann who were
> about to declare bankruptcy except to get some money out of the
> derivatives and pass the bad debts back to Lehmann who then fall on their
> sword. Is that too conspiratorial?
________________

Interesting. I didn't tumble to that part. My guess that it was done to
unwind contractual positions in credit default swaps, and probably
repurchase agreements in order to provide as much "inventory" as possible to
Lehman before Chapter 11-- the inventory will then be used to pay some
percentage of Lehman's outstanding obligations.
______________
>
> * Some bourgeois commentators are now claiming (of course!) that this is
> all the fault of government interference and the markets should be left to
> 'correct' themselves but if Keen (below) is right thats just not an
> option.
___________________________

Commentators always claim that. It's the tweedledum to the tweedledee. The
fact is most of the subprime mortgages were issued in 2006 and the first
half of 2007. These were issued without government interference, government
regulation. Equally of a fact, difficulties in mortgage repayment rates, in
loan quality, and in the housing construction market were being reported as
early as 2005.
____________________
Is there a simple way to explain to people whats happening in class terms?
Obviously some capitalists will go under - but ultimately its workers who
will pay (even those yuppie bond traders have discovered they are capital
dependent).
_______________________
Simple way? Not one red cent for universal health care! We need every
penny to bailout our brave investment bankers, who have sacrificed so much
for so long!





________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]