Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

Re: [Marxism] Should IT workers unionize?



> Message: 18
> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:27:49 +0300
> From: Joonas Laine <jjonas@xxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Marxism] Should IT workers unionize?
>
> Anyone read any good books on the "high tech revolution", and what it
> really means? Is it a paradigmatic shift in capitalism, or more or
> less
> the same shit in a different package? The autonomists' material is
> heavy
> on impressionistic philosophizing, but very lean on any numbers.
> *Politically* though I think it's worth responding to, all the more so
> because they do make very good critical points e.g. on the social
> democratic left's orientation towards the "wellfare state".

Although it might seem far from the theoretical orbit and political
range of the expected Marxist references on this question (in fact, it
is consciously distanced from party-oriented doctrinal and gestural
declarations of fealty), Yann Moulier Boutang's recent _Le capitalisme
cognitif: la nouvelle grande transformation_ (Paris: Éditions
Amsterdam, 2007) is a decisive reference. As is obvious from the
title, Polanyi is also a source here.

The work of the many thinkers around the journal _Multitudes_ such as
Moulier Boutang and Maurizio Lazaratto is highly pertinent to this
question. Perhaps the demands put forward by many of these thinkers,
centered to an extent around the movement for a global 'guaranteed
income', might possibly strike many Marxists as insufficient and
cursory. Nevertheless, they have the distinct advantage of seriously
investigating the new shifts in the development of the productive
forces, the total social processes which are in transition under the
effect of cognitive labor, and the new possibilities for recombination
occasioned by the increasingly general circulation of socialized
knowledge - the well-known "general intellect" of the _Grundrisse_. In
fact, I think that it can be argued that much of this work resembles
strongly an attempt to give a new significance to historical
materialism in our time, and to begin the analysis again from the
ground up.
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]