Re: [Marxism] greenwald/olberman

["S. Artesian" <sartesian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Was that meant for me? If so, all I can say is Olberman is not a Marxist. 
He is, to use Marvin's term, a partisan and agent of the "reformist" section 
of the ruling class. So what you're arguing in essence is that the choice is 
between the goon O'Reilly (or however he spells it) and the apologizing 
liberal Olberman?

Not for nothing does Marxism employ the category of necessity and dispense 
with the notion of choice.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "abu hartal" <abuhartal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <sartesian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:48 PM
Subject: [Marxism] greenwald/olberman



________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu