Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] This government has been the most rightwing since the second world war
The prospect of a Tory in No 10 does worry me - but no more so than another
term for this cabinet of war criminals
* George Monbiot <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/georgemonbiot>
*
Close
This article appeared in the Guardian
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian> on Tuesday May 20 2008
You can hear the wringing of hands and tearing of cloth all the way down
Farringdon Road. Dismayed by the local election results, convinced that
Labour will be crushed in Thursday's byelection, afraid that this will
presage disaster in the next general election, my fellow columnists are
predicting the end of the civilised world. But I can't understand why we
should care.
Yes, I worry about what the Tories might do if they get in. I also worry
about what Labour might do if it wins another term. Why should anyone on the
left seek the re-election of the most rightwing government Britain has had
since the second world war?
New Labour's apologists keep reminding us of the redistributive policies it
has introduced: Sure Start children's centres, reductions in child poverty,
raising the school leaving age, the national minimum wage, flexible hours
for parents and carers, better conditions for part-time workers, the decent
homes programme, free museums, more foreign aid. All these are real
achievements and deserve to be celebrated. But the catalogue of failures,
backsliding and outright destruction is much longer and more consequential.
One fact alone should disqualify this government from office: we have a
cabinet of war criminals. The Nuremberg tribunal characterised a war of
aggression as "the supreme international crime". It is not just that
Britain's Labour government launched and sustained an unprovoked war, it
also sabotaged all means of achieving a peaceful resolution. In April 2002
it helped the Bush administration to sack José Bustani, the head of the
Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, in order to prevent
him settling the dispute over Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction. In
two separate offers before the invasion, Saddam Hussein agreed to meet the
terms the US and Britain were demanding. But they slapped him down and
concealed his offers from their electorates. (All references are on my
website.)
Cluster bombs can be legally used because the British government helped to
block an international ban in 2006: it is still holding out against an
outright ban at the current talks in Dublin. The government has undermined
another international peace agreement - the nuclear non-proliferation treaty
- by deciding to renew the Trident missile programme. It was the first
administration to announce a policy of pre-emptive nuclear attack: even the
great nuclear enthusiast Harold Macmillan never went this far. In 2007 the
defence secretary, without parliamentary debate, revealed that the US would
be allowed to use the listening station at Menwith Hill for its missile
defence system.
Labour appears to be prepared to meet any demand the Bush administration
makes, however outrageous. In 2003 the government signed a one-sided
extradition treaty, permitting the US to extract our citizens without
producing prima facie evidence of an offence. In the same year the defence
secretary announced that he would restructure the British armed forces to
make them "inter-operable" with those of the United States, ensuring for the
first time in British history that they became functionally subordinate to
those of another sovereign power.
Labour's foreign policy is as unethical as Margaret Thatcher's. It provides
military aid to the government of Colombia, whose troops are involved in a
campaign of terror against the civilian population. It granted an open
licence for weapons exports to the government of Uzbekistan, and sacked the
British ambassador when he tried to draw attention to the regime's human
rights abuses. It has collaborated with the US programme of extra-judicial
kidnapping and imprisonment, left our citizens to languish in Guantánamo
Bay, and made use of Pakistani torture chambers in seeking to extract
testimony from British suspects. Until 2005 it tied its foreign aid
programme to the privatisation of public utilities in some of the world's
poorest countries. Last year it held out against reform of the International
Monetary Fund's unfair allocation of votes.
The proportion of the British population in prison has risen by a fifth
since the Tories left office. Today Britain locks up 151 out of every
100,000 people. The Chinese judiciary, by contrast, which is notorious for
its willingness to bang up anyone and everyone, jails 119 people per
100,000; Burma imprisons 120; Saudi Arabia 132. The Serious Organised Crime
and Police Act, passed in 2005, contains clauses that permit the police to
ban any demonstration, however peaceful. It is one of a long series of bills
the Labour government has passed that restrict the right to protest.
The citizen has been re-regulated; business has been deregulated. Last year
deaths caused by serious injuries at work rose by 11%: a predictable result
of the sacking of 1,000 staff at the Health & Safety Executive and a 24%
reduction in workplace inspections. In 2006 the government instructed the
Serious Fraud Office to drop its corruption case against the arms
manufacturer BAE Systems. It has obstructed efforts by other states to
investigate the company.
Labour has shifted taxation from the rich to the poor, cutting corporation
tax from 33% to 28% and capital gains tax from 40% to 18%, and introducing a
new entrepreneurs' relief scheme, taxing the first million of capital gains
at just 10%. It tried to raise the income tax paid by the poorest earners
from 10% to 20%. Labour has lifted the inheritance tax threshold from
£300,000 to £700,000, and maintained the cap on the highest rates of council
tax. While vigorously prosecuting benefits cheats, it has allowed tax
avoidance, mostly by the very rich, to reach an estimated £41bn. Inequality
today is slightly worse than it was when Labour took power in 1997 (the Gini
coefficient which measures it has risen from 0.33 to 0.35).
Both as chancellor and prime minister, Gordon Brown has forced the private
finance initiative into almost all public services. His privatisation
schemes have crept into places where the Conservative government never dared
to tread. Labour has waged war against our planning system and overseen a
disastrous decline in social housing: under Thatcher an average of 46,600
social homes were built every year; under Tony Blair the average was 17,300.
Labour is closing post offices, small schools and GPs' surgeries, while
overseeing a doubling of airport capacity and the construction of 4,000km of
trunk roads. These developments ensure that even the modest targets in the
climate change bill are likely to be missed. Carbon dioxide pollution fell
faster under the Conservatives than under Labour.
Above all, the Labour government has destroyed hope. It has put into
practice Thatcher's dictum that "there is no alternative" to a market
fundamentalism that subordinates human welfare to the demands of business.
Labour has created a political monoculture that kills voters' enthusiasm,
and has delayed electoral reforms that would have given smaller parties an
opportunity to be heard. All we are left with is fear: the fear that this
awful government might be replaced by something slightly worse. Fear has
destroyed the Labour party, but people keep supporting it in trepidation of
letting the other side win.
Save this government? I would sooner give money to the Malarial Mosquito
Conservation Project. Of all the causes leftist thinkers might support, New
Labour must be the least deserving.
monbiot.com <http://monbiot.com/>
George Monbiot
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is
violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." Arthur
Schopenhauer (1788-1860)
**************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family
favorites at AOL Food.
(http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] 2.40pm I.T. May 21 update now on blog,
Max Lane Wed 21 May 2008, 07:33 GMT
- [Marxism] Just did 1.15pm Indonesian time Blog update for May 21,
Max Lane Wed 21 May 2008, 06:10 GMT
- [Marxism] INDONESIA: Bima region, east Indonesia,
Max Lane Wed 21 May 2008, 05:51 GMT
- [Marxism] INDONESIA: May 21 updates,
Max Lane Wed 21 May 2008, 05:27 GMT
- [Marxism] This government has been the most rightwing since the second world war,
Dbachmozart Wed 21 May 2008, 03:58 GMT
- [Marxism] INDONESIA MAY 21 UPDATE: 10-11am Indonesian time,
Max Lane Wed 21 May 2008, 03:40 GMT
- [Marxism] an article on the Maoist victory in Nepal and the road ahead,
mritiunjoy mohanty Wed 21 May 2008, 03:38 GMT
- [Marxism] White supremacy losing ground in gay marriage fight (complicated, I admit -- more later),
Fred Feldman Wed 21 May 2008, 03:16 GMT
- [Marxism] 8, 000 angry at fuel price rises surround palace in Jakarta,
Peter Boyle Wed 21 May 2008, 02:05 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]