Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
[Marxism] If Cheney & Co. Had Really
Plotted the 9/11 Attacks ...
Carrol Cox wrote:
>
>I keep coming back to my suspicion that most conspiracist thinking is
>deeply racist. One can't believe that some stupid Arab such as bin Laden
>could have pulled off such a marvelous feat as 911. Must have been those
>brilliant white men in D.C.
I suppose Comrade Cox would have made a similar argument in the mid
1980s concerning the distribution of Crack:
"I keep coming back to my suspicion that most conspiracist thinking
is deeply racist. One can't believe that some Black guys could have
pulled off such a marvelous feat as creating a multi-billion dollar
drug industry out of whole cloth right under the government's nose.
Must have been those brilliant white men in D.C."
Solidarity,
Shawn
^^^^^^
CB: I agree with Comrade Shawn. As a Black person and an anti-racist activist
I find this one to be off. Also, I donât know of one Black person who thinks
itâs racist to posit US influence in whatever happened on 9/11. Furthermore,
the most direct racism would be blaming 20 Arabs if they didn't do it or making
the front for something that involved Americans. Certainly, it increases
anti-Arab racism in the US.
For one thing, bin Laden was one of Reaganâs âfreedom fightersâ while
the US was supplying the reactionary terrorist gang,
counter-revolutionaries/contras in Afghanistan with shoulder stinger missiles
and other high tech weaponry that allowed them to defeat the Soviet Army which
was supporting a revolutionary government in Afghanistan not unlike the one in
Nicaragua that had to deal with contras. Anyway, once a CIA property always a
CIA property, so do we know that bin Laden is not still some kind of US agent ?
Heâs a reactionary and Bush is a reactionary. Birds of a feather. And if
we ask âCui bono ? â about 9/11, both Bush and US imperialism and bin Laden
and Islamic reaction benefited from it. Bush was able to get everything he
wanted from Congress under the pall of 9/11 terror and fear, and Reaganism got
a few extra years of life out of it. Bushâs attack on the two Middle Eastern
countries was exactly what bin Laden wanted to ramp up more hatred of the US
and recruit more people to his reactionary movement. Why is it that Bush
has failed to capture bin Laden , âdead or alive ?â Why is it that bin
Laden seems to release video tapes at times when the impact of them on US
politics benefits the US righwing ? All this is circumstantial evidence as far
as the specifics of the physics of the Towers falling and all that. But it is
a reason not to dismiss suspicions about the official story of 9/11, whether it
means considering 9/11 lite theories or otherwise.
This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc.
www.surfcontrol.com
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] If Cheney & Co. Had Really, (continued)
- Re: [Marxism] If Cheney & Co. Had Really,
Mehmet Cagatay Tue 20 May 2008, 20:19 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] If Cheney & Co. Had Really,
Eli Stephens Tue 20 May 2008, 20:27 GMT
- [Marxism] If Cheney & Co. Had Really,
Charles Brown Tue 20 May 2008, 21:18 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] If Cheney & Co. Had Really,
Mike Friedman Wed 21 May 2008, 00:34 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] If Cheney & Co. Had Really,
Fred Feldman Wed 21 May 2008, 06:06 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]