[Marxism] Lenni Brenner on Obama

[Walter Lippmann <walterlx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Subject:        Obama's Constitution, His Pastor, 
& His Unbelieving Mom In Heaven
Date:   Sun, 6 Apr 2008 23:42:24 EDT
From:   BrennerL21@xxxxxxx
To:     BrennerL21@xxxxxxx

Obama's Constitution, His Pastor, & His Unbelieving Mom In Heaven By
Lenni Brenner

According to the classic publishing world joke, Lincoln, doctors and
dogs are always public favorites, so a book about Lincoln's doctor's
dog would always be the best seller the year it came out. But today
it would be about Barack Obama's pastor's racism. Already vast
forests are history, paper for articles praising his 3/18 speech.
Unfortunately these are as imperfect as Obama's "A More Perfect
Union."

l - Floundering about the founding fathers

Before no less than eight flags, across from Philadelphia's
Convention Hall, the herald of "change" started orating with a gush
of same ol' same ol' patriotic rhetoric:

"Two hundred and twenty-one years ago, in a hall that still stands
across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple
words, launched America's improbable experiment in democracy. Farmers
and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean
to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration
of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the
spring of 1787."

Who escaped "tyranny and persecution"? Thirty-nine delegates, seven
born abroad, signed the constitution. Caribbean-born Alexander
Hamilton came to New York for college. Robert Morris came at 13 from
Liverpool. Scot James Wilson arrived at 23 after graduating college.

Four were Irish. William Paterson arrived at two. James McHenry
emigrated at 18. Scot Presbyterians were brought to Ireland to help
oppress the Catholic natives. There was legal discrimination against
them, but it was next to nothing compared to total catholic exclusion
from citizenship. Encyclopedias don't even mention youthful religious
problems. British officer Pierce Butler came before the revolution
and married a slave-holder heiress. A foe of "tyranny"? He was
responsible for Article lV, Section 2 of the Constitution:

"No Person held to service or labour in one state, under the laws
thereof, escaping into another, shall, in consequence of any law or
regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labour, but
shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service may
be due."

Catholic Thomas FitzSimons came to colonial Pennsylvania but couldn't
hold office there until the revolution, when the new state abolished
its test oath. The banker was for religious liberty but he wanted to
limit the federal vote to property owners.

Native Americans didn't need foreigners' warnings re theocratic
bigotry. In 1784-86, James Madison and Virginia's legislature,
reacting to persecution of Baptists, disestablished the Anglican
church. Obama's flags and concocted religious tyranny and persecution
overture were nothing more than a setting for discussion of Reverend
Jeremiah Wright's "incendiary language ... that denigrate both the
greatness and the goodness of our nation." However, as he threw the
convention's attitude towards religion into today's political game,
let's keep it in play. How did it really treat religion?

All historians see Madison as "the father of the Constitution" for
pushing it thru. According to his notes, religion suddenly became the
hot topic on 6/28/1787. Old Ben Franklin rose, explaining that

"The small progress we have made after 4 or five weeks close
attendance & continual reasonings with each other ... is methinks a
melancholy proof of the imperfection of the Human understanding....
[H]ow has it happened, Sir, that we have not hitherto once thought of
humbly applying to the Father of lights to illuminate our
understandings? In the beginning of the contest with G. Britain, when
we were sensible of danger we had daily prayer in this room for the
divine protection. Our prayers, Sir, were heard, and they were
graciously answered.... [T]he longer I live, the more convincing
proofs I see of this truth -- that God governs in the affairs of
men.... I therefore beg leave to move -- that henceforth prayers
imploring the assistance of Heaven, and its blessings on our
deliberations, be held in this Assembly every morning before we
proceed to business, and that one or more of the clergy of this city
requested to officiate in that service."

This was too much for "Hamilton & several others." They
"expressed their apprehension that however proper such a resolution
might have been at the beginning of our convention, it might at this
late day, 1. bring on it some disagreeable animadversions. & 2. lead
the public to believe that the embarrassments and dissentions within
the convention, had suggested this measure.... Adjournment was at
length carried, without any vote on the motion."

Franklin wrote later that "the Convention, except three or four
persons, thought Prayers unnecessary."

On 8/20, South Carolina's Charles Pinckney presented Article Vl.

"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members
of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial
Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall
be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no
religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any
Office or public Trust under the United States."

The convention was closed to the public. Rejection of Franklin's call
only came out later. Today few know of it. Of course Article Vl is
still in it, but when most educated Americans think of the
constitution and religion, they usually mean the 1st Amendment's
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." However Madison only
pledged to add the Bill or Rights after the Philadelphia convention,
to win public support for it. He presented it to the 1st Congress, in
New York, in 1789. It wasn't ratified until 1791. But Article Vl
already made the 1787 convention the role model for France's secular
republican revolutionaries in 1789.

ll - Wright's number one sin?

Given that nothing re conventional secularism found its way into his
4,881 word-long script, its no surprise that, beyond generalities,
Obama cited only one example of Wright's anti-white racism, the "view
that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the
actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the
perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam."

Very few journalistic essays on the speech, pro or con, commented on
this. But Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League "praised Obama for
an 'element of sensitivity to the Jewish community,' including his
'specific reference to Israel as our ally, his condemnation of
radical Islam.'" (Jewish Week, 3/21)

Foxman and Obama didn't explain Wright's hostility to Israel. But
they know what generated it. The 2/25 NY Sun had Obama declaring
"anti-Zionist statements made by his pastor ... were 'rooted in'
anger over the Jewish state's support for South Africa during the
apartheid era. 'That was a source of tension.'" Yet he had to admit
that he "never heard anything that would suggest anti-Semitism on the
part of the pastor."

The 2/9 NY Times had Obama, born in 1961, contacting "members of the
African National Congress to have them speak" at LA's Occidental
College, 1979-81. He "spoke at a campus divestment rally." In his
junior year he transferred to Columbia in NYC. The 10/30/07 Times
told of a 2005 university journal interview:

"He said he was somewhat involved with the Black Student Organization
and anti-apartheid activities, though, in recent interviews, several
prominent student leaders said they did not remember his playing a
role."

Wright was right. The Zionist-Apartheid alliance was criminal. The
12/14/81 Times headlined an article "South Africa Needs More Arms,
Israeli Says." That was Ariel Sharon. Was Obama opposed to Israel's
support for the hateful regime? If so, why does he support Israel
today? If he didn't oppose Israel then, why so, given that his own
pastor and many other Blacks exposed Israel? Desmond Tutu and other
SA anti-apartheid leaders still denounce Israeli injustices. Is Obama
prepared to publicly exile the bishop to the political-theological
limbo he sent his minister?

Many Democrats buy Clinton's line that he lacks experience in world
affairs. If he played a significant role fighting apartheid, Obama
would answer her by citing it. No mincing words: That he, half
African no less, didn't 'major' in anti-apartheid in school, like
thousands of black and white US students, is a glaring demonstration
of irresponsible world politics. This is reinforced by his near
silence re today's Africa. Bill Clinton starts philanthropic
discussions of the continent by confessing that his administration
never even discussed the Rwanda slaughter. Wouldn't Obama shout about
Hillary's non-role in that horror if he did anything notable in that
era?

lll - Our constitutional star is also theologically expert

Given Obama's repudiation of the politics of the cleric who recruited
him to Christianity, some folks wanted to know how that effected him
theologically. The 3/27 Christian Post relates how, "while answering
a question about his Christian faith" in North Carolina, he

"said he believes that Jesus Christ died for his sins and through
God's grace and mercy he could have 'everlasting life'.... But he
also believes Jews and Muslims and non-believers who live moral lives
are as much 'children of God' as he is ... he spoke about his late
mother who was 'not a believer'... 'she was the kindest, most decent,
generous person that I have ever known' .... 'I'm sure she is in
heaven, even though she may not have subscribed to everything that 
I subscribe to.'"

As an atheist, this concerns me personally. If she is in heaven, 
I can go there even though I insist that it doesn't exist. But before 
I go anywhere, I ask what the weather is like, what will I do there,
etc. So readers, atheist or pious, must be Christlike and forgive me
for closing this article with some questions for Obama. I'll send it
to him. Naturally I don't expect an answer. He is busy. But maybe 
I'm wrong? After all, can't a guy who's up-to-date on the detailed
demography of today's paradise perform other miracles?

***

Hi Barrack,

According to the 3/27 Christian Post, you told a North Carolina
audience that you believe that "non-believers who live moral lives
are as much 'children of God' as you are. You said that your

"late mother who was 'not a believer ... was the kindest, most
decent, generous person that I have ever known .... I'm sure she is
in heaven, even though she may not have subscribed to everything that
I subscribe to.'"

This will please 44% of Americans. In 1999, they, mostly believers,
told Gallup that nice atheists go there. As you, like them, are
expert on such matters, I take the liberty of asking some questions.

1. - You said on 3/18 that Reverend Jeremiah Wright used

"incendiary language ... that denigrate both the greatness and the
goodness of our nation." You claim he "sees the conflicts in the
Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies
like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful
ideologies of radical Islam."

Is he is banned from heaven?

2. - In North Carolina, you declared "Muslims" as much "children of
God" as yourself, eligible for heavenly residence. But on 3/18 you
denounced "perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam" which
attack "stalwart allies like Israel." Does this mean that God, or
whoever sells apartments in heaven, won't admit Hamas followers and
other Muslims opposed to Israel's "actions"?

3. You opine that "Jews" are likewise welcomed. But thousands of
Orthodox Jews live in Israel, categorically opposed to its existence.
They claim that only God can recreate a genuine Jewish kingdom, if
the Jews repent their sins. Are they also forbidden entry?

4. - What does your mom say re winding up in a place she didn't
believe in? Can she leave on vacation or permanently?

5. - Tell us atheists if we -- and pious believers like yourself --
can bring our pets? A 2006 Washington Post survey found 43% of
Americans believing pets go to heaven. Ninety-three percent of these
philosophers insist that they can go, "even if their owners do not."
Please think before you answer. We're talking about the swing vote in
Pennsylvania's crucial primary.

6 - Global warming means heat rising high into the sky. So is heaven
getting as hot as hell? I'll need to know what to wear if I go there.

7 - Speaking of hell, a 2/25/03 Gallup poll announced that 67% of all
Democrats and 79% of Republicans believe in the Devil. The Gallup
organization is noted for its piety, but this troubled them:

"Over the centuries, science has been able to explain many phenomena
that once seemed supernatural. Bad weather, ill health, and heretical
opinions may not be the work of the infernal after all. With the
advent of evolutionary theory and modern psychology, these days we're
more likely to think of people who do terrible things as broken human
beings, rather than agents of the netherworld. Furthermore, religion
has ceded its civil authority, and religiosity has declined somewhat
in American society. So we might expect belief in the devil to have
largely evaporated. It hasn't. Regardless of political belief,
religious inclination, education, or region, most Americans believe
that the devil exists."

I disagree with the Gallup folks on one point. My observation is that
the devil is real for the ignorant poor, but for educated believers
he's just a character in Goethe's Faust or Gounod's opera by that
name. What do you say?

As an atheist, I argue that the poll really gives us the gut-basic
difference between typical Democrats and Republicans. The average
Democrat has a nit-sized brain, ordinary Republicans have nat-sized
brains. Does this sound right to you? Or do you think its the other
way around?

Stay well, give 'em hell,

Lenni Brenner

Obama Suggests Jesus Christ Not the Only Way to Heaven

By Jennifer Riley
Christian Post Reporter
Thu, Mar. 27 2008 

FULL:
www.christianpost.com/article/20080327/31706_Obama_Suggests_Jesus_Christ_Not_the_Only_Way_to_Heaven.htm


=========================================
     WALTER LIPPMANN
     Los Angeles, California
     Editor-in-Chief, CubaNews
     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CubaNews/
     "Cuba - Un ParaÃso bajo el bloqueo"
=========================================

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: 
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/options/marxism/archive%40archives.econ.utah.edu