[Marxism] ZNet Commentary: Obama in Teheran

["Walter Lippmann" <walterlx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

ZNet Commentary
Obama in Teheran March 22, 2008
By Vijay Prashad 

Barack Obama's suggestion that he would sit down and talk with the
Iranian Prime Minister is perhaps the most sensible policy proposal
in the stale foreign policy air of Washington, DC. Twice before
Teheran has publicly reached out to the US, but both times it has
been rebuffed. In 1998, Iranian President Mohammed Khatami proposed a
"dialogue among civilization," which the UN adopted in 2001 as its
theme for the year. Washington ignored the move, and turned its back
on Khatami's 2003 proposal that the US and Iran begin serious
negotiations toward normal relations. In 2006, Iran's current
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad sent President Bush a lengthy letter
with "new ways" forward for the two countries. Bush, like Clinton
before him, snubbed his nose eastwards. Washington's refusal to talk
to Iran is stubbornly myopic.

Washington's reticence is curious. It comes at a time when the US
armed forces have given Iran an immeasurably valuable gift in these
past few years. Afghanistan's Taliban and Iraq's Ba'ath were two of
Iran's great foes in the region. Iran had been hemmed in between
these two adversaries. A failed war in the 1980s rendered its western
border frozen, and the rise of the Taliban on the eastern border
removed Iran's close allies (such as Ismail Khan of Herat). US armed
force dethroned both the Taliban and the Ba'ath, providing Iran with
a major strategic victory, and allowing it to flex its influence into
Baghdad and Kabul (Ismail Khan is the Minister of Energy in Hamid
Karzai's government). Iran is now the key player in the region,
pushing against the more socially conservative bloc led by the Gulf
royals. Beyond the region, Iran has positioned itself as the Middle
East's ally of others who fear US unilaterialism (such as Venezuela's
Chavez and Russia's Putin).

Close to ninety percent of the registered Democrats want the US
forces withdrawn from Iraq within the year. But this withdrawal alone
will not solve the mess created in the region by the Bush adventures.
As the US forces leave, Iran is poised to be the Middle East's
protagonist. If Iraq's ruling government has close links to Teheran,
the Shia working-class across the region (from eastern Saudi Arabia
to Lebanon and into Pakistan) have affective ties to Iran. This
sentimental and political bond to Teheran cannot be bombed into
submission. John McCain's tasteless "Bomb, Bomb Iran" might play well
with what Alexis de Tocqueville called the "irritable patriotism" of
some Americans, but it is a baseless foundation for a foreign policy.
Hillary Clinton joined this McCain strategy when she voted to censure
Iran's Revolutionary Guard in 2007, a move that was seen in the
Middle East as an act of war. Iran's seventy-two million people
recognize this belligerence, which is only the most recent attempt by
the US government to run up against Iranian nationalism (most people
know that the CIA removed Iran's democratically elected prime
minister in 1953 and enthroned the unpopular Shah). Showing Iran our
muscles is not going to be impressive.

A hidden sentence in our Declaration of Independence says that
Americans should show "a decent respect to the opinions of mankind."
The Bush adventures have shown us that a tin ear combined with cruise
missiles does not necessarily produce submission (North Korea and
Iran are stronger now than they were in early 2001, and Iraq is in
turmoil). What we need is a different philosophy to govern our
foreign policy. Obama's suggestion that he would talk to any leader,
without preconditions, is refreshingly innovative. In November 2007,
he said that he would meet the Iranian leadership and assure them
that regime change is not on his agenda, but behavior change is
certainly part of what he would negotiate toward. The most important
aspect of his statement was not how he would talk to the Iranians,
but that he would do so. Obama seems to recognize that Iran is a
major player in the region, and it will not be bullied. The mess in
Iraq and Afghanistan can only be sorted out with Iran on-board as an
active participant in a multilateral, regional engagement. Obama is
on the right track. One hopes that his foreign policy audacity will
not fall by the wayside.


Vijay Prashad is the George and Martha Kellner Chair of South Asian
History, Professor and Director of International Studies at Trinity
College, Hartford. His most recent book is The Darker Nations: A
People's History of the Third World (New Press, paperback March
2008).
========================================
WALTER LIPPMANN, CubaNews
Los Angeles, California
http://www.walterlippmann.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CubaNews/
"Cuba - Un Paraiso bajo el bloqueo"
======================================== 




________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism