Re: [Marxism] In Solidarity with the People of Tibet

[dogangoecmen@xxxxxxx]

 Shacht@xxxxxxx wrote:

"What has happened to twenty-first century "Marxists" that there is even a 
question of Tibet's right to independence?"

National independence is an illusion in the 21st century. As soon as Tibet 
becomes "independent" there will arise immediately how and what kind of 
economic system is going to be established there. If you want to establish a 
capitalist system there then you have to work closely with one or some 
imperialist countries, you have to lend money to there conditions and so on to 
do that system.? Imerdiately you will and have recognise who is your new 
master. Contemporary world system is an closely interdependent one. There is no 
national independence any more in the 21st century and you have to decide what 
kind of social system you want to establish in your country and with help of 
which international forces.
Dogan




**************Create a Home Theater Like the Pros. Watch the video on AOL 
Home.      
(http://home.aol.com/diy/home-improvement-eric-stromer?video=15?ncid=aolhom00030000000001)
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism



 


________________________________________________________________________
Bei AOL gibt's jetzt kostenlos eMail f?r alle.  Klicken Sie auf AOL.de um 
heraus zu finden, was es sonst noch kostenlos bei AOL gibt.
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism