Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] Socially Necessary Abstract(?) Labor Time
Depends how you interpret it. I read the text as saying that the
abstraction of considering labour only as the expenditure of
labour-power is justified because commodities really do quantitatively
confront each other in exchange in accordance with the magnitude of
labour they embody considered as such and measured in time. The
ontological conclusions you draw seem to me textually unwarranted,
which does not necessarily mean they are wrong; and methodologically
problematic, which does mean that I don't agree with them.
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- Re: [Marxism] Socially Necessary Abstract(?) Labor Time, (continued)
- Re: [Marxism] Socially Necessary Abstract(?) Labor Time,
Angelus Novus Mon 17 Mar 2008, 22:50 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Socially Necessary Abstract(?) Labor Time,
Ed George Tue 18 Mar 2008, 11:31 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Socially Necessary Abstract(?) Labor Time,
Angelus Novus Tue 18 Mar 2008, 11:45 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Socially Necessary Abstract(?) Labor Time,
Ed George Tue 18 Mar 2008, 12:03 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Socially Necessary Abstract(?) Labor Time,
Angelus Novus Tue 18 Mar 2008, 13:00 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Socially Necessary Abstract(?) Labor Time,
Ed George Tue 18 Mar 2008, 14:58 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Socially Necessary Abstract(?) Labor Time,
Mehmet Cagatay Tue 18 Mar 2008, 19:09 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]