Marxism
mailing list archive

Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]

Date:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Thread:  [ Previous  | Next  ]      Index:  [ Author  | Date  | Thread  ]

[Marxism] Leo Strauss as myth-maker



Noble lies and deadly truths

From Wikipedia:

"Strauss noted that thinkers of the first rank, going back to Plato,
had raised the problem of whether good and effective politicians
could be completely truthful and still achieve the necessary ends of
their society. By implication, Strauss asks his readers to consider
whether it is true that noble lies have no role at all to play in
uniting and guiding the polis. Are myths needed to give people
meaning and purpose and to ensure a stable society? Or can men
dedicated to relentlessly examining, in Nietzsche's language, those
"deadly truths," flourish freely? Thus, is there a limit to the
political, and what can be known absolutely? In The City and Man,
Strauss discusses the myths outlined in Plato's Republic that are
required for all governments. These include a belief that the state's
land belongs to it even though it was likely acquired illegitimately
and that citizenship is rooted in something more than the accidents
of birth. Seymour Hersh observes that Strauss endorsed noble lies:
myths used by political leaders seeking to maintain a cohesive
society.[14]....

Critics of Strauss accuse him of mendacious populism (while actually
being elitist), radical illiberalism and anti-democratic sentiment.
Shadia Drury, in Leo Strauss and the American Right (1999), argues
that Strauss taught different things to different students and
inculcated an elitist strain in American political leaders that is
linked to imperialist militarism and Christian fundamentalism. Drury
accuses Strauss of teaching that "perpetual deception of the citizens
by those in power is critical because they need to be led, and they
need strong rulers to tell them what's good for them." Nicholas Xenos
similarly argues that Strauss "was not an anti-liberal in the sense
in which we commonly mean 'anti-liberal' today, but an anti-democrat
in a fundamental sense, a true reactionary. Strauss was somebody who
wanted to go back to a previous, pre-liberal, pre-bourgeois era of
blood and guts, of imperial domination, of authoritarian rule, of
pure fascism."[2"
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism



Other Periods  | Other mailing lists  | Search  ]