Re: [Marxism] Cockburn contrarianism

[dave.walters@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Louis, seriously, you got to calm down. I don't "work in a 
nuclear power" in California. How many times do I gotta 
tell you dude? I work in an old clunker gas-fired power 
plant right near downtown San Francisco. Go to google 
maps and look for 1207 Illinois St. Can't miss it. Really.
 
But if I did, I would be even MORE experienced in this 
discussion than I am now. Even if I did, whether they 
built another plant anywhere in the world would by wholly 
irrelevant to my "high salary" or my job. Nice one, care to try again?
 
I brought up the point about Haines, well, actually you 
brought him up, because he *has experience* working/living 
on and near a reactor. It's relevant because ex-navy 
nuclear personnel have no more illnesses than anyone 
else in society which I think shows that there is safety 
in nuclear energy assumed by many to be dangerous. 
You clearly are not paying attention.
 
And Tony, right, the fact that he's educated in physics 
automatically *disqualifies him????*. So, clearly Louis, 
you take a *religious* point of view toward science 
where physics doesn't matter. You are more at home 
with Creationists than scientists I see. I was right, you 
don't care about discussing the differences that exist 
with anyone do you? If you are going to function like 
a sarcastic dilettante, then you ought to do everyone a 
favor and stay out the discussion.
 
David
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism