Re: [Marxism] Why Ralph Nader Should Run for President in 2008 - Statementfrom Twin Cities Socialist Alternative branches

[Carrol Cox <cbcox@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dan DiMaggio wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> McKinney has much less name
> recognition and therefore Nader would be the stronger candidate in my
> opinion.

Stronger how? For what? No one plans to win the election, so what is the
purpose and how is that purpose best achieved?

Which candidate this year might have results that would be making a
dofferemce 10 years from now? Liftists have to take a view that is
simultaneously shortandlong range.

Myself, I'm only interested in the campaign in so far as it shows a
promise of forming relationships in the present that I can build on in
th3 future. The campaign, not the number of votes, counts.

Carrol


________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism