Re: [Marxism] WHY NADER? by Peter Miguel Camejo

[Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>]

> To espouse Nader's cause, in my opinion, is to be for the enlargement of 
> the existing Green Party; to espouse McKinney's is to argue for the 
> re-definition AND RE-COMPOSITION of the Green Party as a fighting 
> instrument of America's oppressed and downtrodden.
> 
> David McDonald

I have no fucking idea what is going on here. After I wrote "Hurray" to 
the news that Cynthia McKinney intended to run for President, Erik Toren 
sent a cautionary note about divisions within the Greens, but not the 
typical radical Green versus Demogreen ones. I still have no idea what 
that was about. Now we have Peter Camejo, who has never been shy about 
drawing lines, write this thing on Nader without even mentioning her. 
What the fuck?!?

________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism