Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] Rave review in the New Yorker about "There Will be Blood"
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Marxism] Rave review in the New Yorker about "There Will be Blood"
- From: Louis Proyect <lnp3@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 09:45:10 -0500
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
Ruthless Critic of All that Exists wrote:
> ""There Will Be Blood" is about the driving force of capitalism as it
> both creates and destroys the future, and the film's tone is at once
> elated and sickened."
>
> "Bears comparison to the greatest achievements of Griffith and Ford. "
>
> Full:
> <http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/cinema/2007/12/17/071217crci_cinema_denby>
Just a reminder of what I had to say about this idiotic movie on my
blog. And, yes, I did suffer through until the ending:
This is based on an Upton Sinclair novel about evil oilmen in California
at the turn of the century. It opens in theaters during Christmas week.
The director is a 37 year old named Paul Thomas Anderson whose best
known credits are “Magnolia” and “Boogie Nights,” a movie based on a
porn star. He seems totally uninterested in politics and based his
screenplay on the first 150 pages of Sinclair’s novel. In the novel, the
father is estranged from his son who has become a radical and sides with
striking oilworkers. In the movie, the son hates his father because an
accident at an oil rig has left him deaf. Well, that’s what we are led
to believe in the absence of any other plot elements. The movie is
mostly about the oilman Daniel Plainview, who is played by Daniel
Day-Lewis. He has captured Anderson’s attention in the way that William
Randolph Hearst captured Orson Welles’s attention in “Citizen Kane”.
However, Anderson is no Welles, to put it mildly. Daniel Day-Lewis looks
like and sounds like the evil water works magnate that John Huston
played in “Chinatown”, another movie about rotten millionaires in
California. If Anderson is no Orson Welles, neither is he a Roman
Polanski. He should stick to subjects that he is more familiar with,
like the comedy “Punch Drunk Love” that he did with Adam Sandler.
Apparently, Anderson is a huge fan of Adam Sandler. Poor Upton Sinclair.
He deserved better.
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
- Thread context:
- [Marxism] Department of unintentional humor, (continued)
- [Marxism] "Baseball can't move on until it apologizes....Bud Selig owes Bonds an apology.",
Fred Feldman Sun 16 Dec 2007, 14:28 GMT
- [Marxism] OUR LAIR OF HUNTERBEAR WEBSITE,
Hunter Gray Sun 16 Dec 2007, 14:04 GMT
- [Marxism] Rave review in the New Yorker about "There Will be Blood",
Ruthless Critic of All that Exists Sun 16 Dec 2007, 11:42 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] Query: Insurgent Sociologist,
Shacht Sun 16 Dec 2007, 02:52 GMT
- Re: [Marxism] In response to Sam Webb's On "The Nature, Role, and Work of the Comm,
PoliticNow Sat 15 Dec 2007, 22:25 GMT
- [Marxism] Why a Palestinian "State" is a Punitive Construct,
Dbachmozart Sat 15 Dec 2007, 20:32 GMT
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]