Marxism
mailing list archive
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]
Date:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Thread:
[ Previous
| Next
]
Index:
[ Author
| Date
| Thread
]
Re: [Marxism] Could Socialists not use "Great" before Britain!
- To: Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition <marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Marxism] Could Socialists not use "Great" before Britain!
- From: Einde O'Callaghan <einde@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 23:01:44 +0100
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)
Greg McDonald schrieb:
> John Edmunson wrote:
>
> "Ireland has never been part of Britain, great or otherwise. The UK is
> the United Kingdom of Great Britain and (now) Northern Ireland. Great
> Britain relates to the whole island, including England, Scotland and
> Wales and predates the existence of those individual nations, or even
> the concept of nations as we understand them. So I don't have a problem
> with the term, but I do tend not to use the term UK as that does tend to
> suggest the legitimacy of British domination of Northern Ireland."
> Cheers,
> John
>
> So what do you write instead of uk? Great Britain? If so, that brings
> us back to the original criticism. but your comment on the 6 counties
> dilemma in Ireland, together with your contribution regarding the
> Celtic Roman provinces and the distinction between Brittany (the
> lesser) and Great Britain (the greater), now makes my original usage
> seem more correct. But "Celtic Roman" provinces? Should we not
> distinguish between the original Celts and the Roman invaders? Maybe
> I'll just write la isla misteriosa.
>
The Celtic Roman provinces were the areas now known as England and
Wales. Southern Scotland (between Hadrians's Wall - roughly from
Carlisle to Newcastle-upon-Tyne - and the Antonine Wall) was
incorporated for only a short time. Armorica in Roman Gaul had, like the
lrest of Gaul, been largely romanised, but was re-celticised, so to
speak, by migrants from Britain during the period of the Saxon
colonisation of southern and eastern Britain - hence the name Britannia
Parva or Little Britain.
I suppose it would also be appropriate to point out that Cornwall, also
a Celtic enclave, had a separate legal status down to at least Tudor
times (and there are claims that it still does) - and indeed the title
Prince of Wales is still linked to the title Duke of Cornwall.
Einde O'Callaghan
________________________________________________
YOU MUST clip all extraneous text before replying to a message.
Send list submissions to: Marxism@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Set your options at: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism
[ Other Periods
| Other mailing lists
| Search
]